Back to @AlexxxCoal's profile

🦑 Alex Coal ♀️ engagement report

@AlexxxCoal - 421K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.638%
of 421K followers
Per impression
2.56%
105K views on a typical post
Reach
24.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.157%
164 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.7/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 421K followers, an engagement rate of 0.638%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 105K times each, and 2.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 24.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 117K interactions, about 44x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #advice, #cij_icj, #freepalesti̇ne.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #advice, #cij_icj, #freepalesti̇ne.

Compared with accounts its own size

🦑 Alex Coal ♀️'s engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 74% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.638%, 🦑 Alex Coal ♀️ sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video54% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 54% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 602 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 202644x their median

    Kick streamer Gtwist was allegedly assaulted by his dad during a livestream, leaving him in tears This is the clip from shortly before the VOD was deleted and the stream ended😳 https://t.co/bAfAQD95fv

    107K4.2K4.1K2.0K24M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202430x their median

    HIND’S HALL 2 VIDEO… All Proceeds from the song are going to @unrwausa Video edited by Omar Alali https://t.co/1BtWDZBdpX

    53K23K3.1K1.9K2.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202618x their median

    🚨 BREAKING: Elon Musk’s Grok AI is being sued for using real child p*rnography in its training data. https://t.co/YgsDxut8G2

    42K5.7K7011.1K3.3M viewsView on X
  • Apr 6, 20258.9x their median

    Israel admits mistakes over medic killings in Gaza https://t.co/PhrWfm5hyz

    13K3.6K4.9K2.4K11M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20267.9x their median

    🚨MANUEL SCHADWALD: El niño cuya muerte fue filmada en el yate de la élite y apareció en los CD-ROM de Zandvoort. El 24 de julio de 1993, Manuel Schadwald, un niño alemán de doce años, salió de su casa en Berlín. Iba solo. Nunca regresó. La policía abrió una investigación. En 1998 la cerró sin resultados. Sin cuerpo. Sin culpables. Sin respuestas. Mientras tanto, en Bélgica y Países Bajos, activistas descubrieron que las pistas llevaban a una red mucho más oscura. Manuel fue secuestrado y llevado a burdeles de niños en Ámsterdam y Rotterdam. Pero la versión más terrorífica apunta al yate Apollo. Según testimonios e inteligencia holandesa, en ese velero el niño fue abusado y asesinado mientras lo grababan. Un snuff film real. El cuerpo fue arrojado al mar y el yate limpiado en un puerto militar. El yate estaba vinculado a Gerrit Ulrich, implicado en el escándalo de Zandvoort (1998). Tras su muerte, la policía encontró miles de imágenes y vídeos de abuso infantil extremo, incluyendo bebés, junto con listas de clientes de varios países. Una de las personas que investigó esta conexión fue Gina Pardaens-Bernaer, trabajadora social belga. Su trabajo la llevó al material de Zandvoort. Envió copias a Interpol. Recibió amenazas. Su hijo fue atropellado. En noviembre de 1998 dijo: “Con lo que he descubierto, o Bélgica explota o me asesinan”. Al día siguiente su coche apareció destrozado contra un puente, sin marcas de frenado. La policía lo cerró como accidente. Horas después allanaron el despacho de su abogado. Gina murió. Su caso se suma a la lista de muertes sospechosas vinculadas a estas investigaciones. El caso de Manuel está directamente conectado con el caso Dutroux. Las mismas redes. Las mismas acusaciones de protección institucional. Las mismas sospechas de que personas influyentes estaban involucradas y que las investigaciones fueron frenadas cuando apuntaban demasiado alto. Las autoridades nunca investigaron a fondo las conexiones con el yate Apollo ni con Zandvoort. La policía holandesa dijo que no encontró nada. La policía alemana cerró el caso sin conectar los puntos. Y sin embargo, los documentos existen. Archivos de inteligencia holandesa hablan de un niño alemán asesinado en un barco y de un caso tapado porque “había personas influyentes a bordo”. Los testimonios detallan hechos y nombres. Gina Pardaens aseguró tener una copia del snuff film. Esa copia desapareció tras su muerte. Treinta y dos años después, Manuel Schadwald sigue desaparecido. No hay justicia. Este caso no es solo la historia de un niño que desapareció. Es la historia de cómo una red de abuso infantil operó durante años en Europa con impunidad. Cómo las investigaciones se detenían cuando llegaban demasiado cerca del poder. Cómo un niño de doce años pudo ser secuestrado, abusado y asesinado mientras alguien lo filmaba… y el sistema decidió que era mejor no mirar. Manuel quería ir a jugar un día de verano. Terminó en un yate de la élite, siendo violado y asesinado mientras grababan su muerte. Y 32 años después seguimos sin saber quiénes estaban en ese barco. La verdad está ahí. En los documentos. En los testimonios. En las conexiones con Zandvoort y Dutroux. La pregunta ya no es qué le pasó a Manuel Schadwald. La pregunta es: ¿cuánto tiempo más vamos a seguir permitiendo que estos casos queden archivados mientras los responsables siguen protegidos?

    14K6.8K262291427K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20267.2x their median

    an angry right-winger asks Muhammad Ali why he refused to be drafted to go fight in Vietnam. Here is his response: https://t.co/Trzu415EIT

    16K3.4K134122367K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.1x their median

    Netanyahu stood at the UN and said Palestine shouldn’t exist, while his own country is younger than my grandfather. 🇵🇸 Only Palestinians can decide Palestine’s future. Palestine for Palestinians. Let the people decide. 💥✊ Our new Lego music video https://t.co/sLWBWbBzX7

    5.9K2.2K158129114K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20262.3x their median

    I reached out to some man on s3xyjobs for a shoot and he said “if you show me a recent std test from within 6 months, I’ll be down to shoot with you” I’m SORRRRRRYYTYY???????? 6 MONTHS??????????

    6.1K25376265K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.1x their median

    A growing number of Portuguese artists have withdrawn from a Lisbon festival headlined by Jerry Seinfeld amid opposition to his outspoken support for Israel. Key Developments Several Portuguese performers have withdrawn from the Commedia a La Carte Fest, where Jerry Seinfeld is scheduled to headline on November 1. Actress and comedian Inês Aires Pereira explicitly cited solidarity with Palestine, saying, “We cannot relativise or normalise a genocide.” Seinfeld has faced repeated protests over his support for Israel and remarks dismissing Palestinian existence and comparing the “Free Palestine” movement to the Ku Klux Klan. https://t.co/uVS9jnrR3d

    4.1K1.2K13764201K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.9x their median

    oscar does nothing but degrade the social fabric of sesame street. why do the other muppets not simply exile or kill him

    4.7K2468183840K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#advice#cij_icj#freepalesti̇ne#lindsayclancy#maga

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 421K followers, an engagement rate of 0.638%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 105K times each, and 2.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 24.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 117K interactions, about 44x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #advice, #cij_icj, #freepalesti̇ne.

What is 🦑 Alex Coal ♀️'s engagement rate on X?
🦑 Alex Coal ♀️ (@AlexxxCoal) has an engagement rate of 0.638%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 420,514 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.638%, 🦑 Alex Coal ♀️ sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AlexxxCoal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AlexxxCoal post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going