Alex Feinberg engagement report
@Alexfeinberg - 71K followers on X
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 71K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 0.845% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.2K interactions, about 357x its own typical post.
Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Alex Feinberg's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 34% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.032%, Alex Feinberg sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 30% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 3% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 322 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 14, 2026357x their median
Underrated life advice: Just stay in the game. The best things in life are a result of compounding. But you can’t compound if you let yourself get taken out of the game. Whatever storm life throws your way, just roll with it. Adapt. Survive and advance. Always stay in the game.
- Sep 11, 202642x their median
I’m not racist, I’m friends with the holdout juror
- Jan 21, 202428x their median
Most talented people don’t make it And most who do, don’t make it as big as they could have Sometimes it’s because their talent was overrated. But usually, it’s because their mindset created a ceiling for their performance I played with 20+ guys who made the MLB I also played with several guys who were offered $1M+ signing bonuses and never made the Show Wanna know a secret most fans never think about? Most of the guys who made $10-$25M could have made $100M if they dropped their limiting beliefs. If they were only able to maintain the irrational self confidence they held at the amateur level. One of my friends who made > $50M called me the other day, telling me what a shitty mindset he had, basically his entire MLB career. He knows he’s not a failure but he still wonders what could have been. And that’s what those who say talent is all that matters get wrong. Most talented performers are underperforming. Only those who can take their mindset to the next level actually become household names. The rest drive nice cars to their nice houses and still wonder what could have been. The worst thing in life isn’t to have failed. It’s to live with regret. As a competitor, you have one obligation with respect to your talent: Maximize it. Because you never know when your time to will be up.
- Sep 11, 202627x their median
Four states have abolished "not guilty by reason of insanity," the traditional insanity defense: Idaho, Kansas, Montana, and Utah. Courts there still consider mental illness at trial and at sentencing. It just can't erase accountability for violent crime. 82% of Americans support life in prison or the death penalty for aggravated murder, even when mental illness is involved, per our national poll. Our experts' fix goes further: narrow incompetency-to-stand-trial standards and allow jail-based restoration — so dangerous defendants can't walk free. https://t.co/JbMNdKHAcp
- Sep 9, 202618x their median
Respect to every sport. Football requires incredible power and speed. 🏈 Basketball requires ridiculous length, coordination and agility. 🏀 Hockey requires balance, toughness and explosiveness. 🏒 Golf requires elite rotational control. ⛳️ But here’s a hill I’ll die on: Hitting a baseball might be the hardest athletic skill in sports to FAKE. You can be one of the greatest athletes on earth. Now stand 60 feet, 6 inches away from a Major League pitcher throwing 98 MPH with late life… While knowing an 88 MPH slider might disappear off the same tunnel. Your athleticism alone isn't saving you. You can't out-run it. You can't out-jump it. You can't overpower it. You have fractions of a second to recognize pitch, velocity, location and movement...decide whether to swing ..and then put a round bat on a round ball. And here's my favorite part: Fail 7 out of 10 times and you might be one of the best hitters on earth. Reaction time. Vision. Pitch recognition. Hand-eye coordination. Body control. Rotational explosiveness. Every sport produces unbelievable athletes. But stepping into a Big League batter's box? You can't fake that. Baseball is different. 🔨⚾️
- Sep 11, 202617x their median
Gym bros want you to think lifting weights is better than cardio for fat loss. That's incorrect. Muscle is metabolically active. It just isn’t the calorie-burning furnace people often make it out to be. At rest, skeletal muscle burns roughly 13 calories/kg/day (about 6 calories/lb/day). So even if you managed to add 10 pounds of actual muscle (which would be a fantastic training result), you’d expect that tissue itself to contribute only about 60 extra calories per day to resting energy expenditure. That's not nothing, but probably a lot less than the “build muscle and torch calories all day” narrative would have you believe.
- Sep 14, 202616x their median
The "AI will kill us all" talk is impossible to take seriously Its all magic thinking ala the worst people you ever met (effective altruists) from the bay era Its disconnected tech nerds sitting at their desk, they couldnt do 1 pullup, theyve never been in a biology lab, theyve no idea the difference between a flathead and a philips screwdriver But the AI is going to somehow DO ALL THE THINGS Its going to HACK the uh....the ROBOTS. THE KILLER ROBOTS (super original idea, I think that may have been in a movie once twice 1000 times) its going to get into the labs...somehow..and make a killer virus...or something (never you dont know shit about fuck with the complexity of biology) It will get into the..the..the....the infrastructure...and then blow something up, and people will DIE (every water treatment plant on earth is secretly power by 1000 KT nuclear reactor with a boom switch) it will KILL US ALL. So please please give our polycule in San Francisco exclusive power over it, pretty please?? WE know whats good for the world (lets not talk about our IPO is coming soon and our valuation depends on a monopoly and stopping open source)
- Sep 14, 202615x their median
Consistently watched the same mistake split winner & losers You will have down years. Period, no exception. Every 5 yrs though? Will be up vs 5 yrs ago The thing losers do is stop their strategy, quit, or get emotional. It’s one year If 1/5 years is bad that’s 20% big whoop
- Sep 11, 202611x their median
Murderers should be executed under the same conditions that they committed murder Stabbing, exercise bands, whatever
- Sep 11, 20267.9x their median
Pete Crow-Armstrong admitted it: every time he struggled, he tried to hit MORE. (Now he's hitting less and producing more on the field) Most hitters do the same. They think MORE is the fix for a slump. It isn't. More reps usually just means more mental clutter. I was that guy too. Heart racing, hands shaking, trying so hard I froze. I didn't need more swings. I needed to train winning. Stop playing for your stats. Play for the runner on base, the guys in the dugout, the front of your jersey. Focus on "me" and you freeze. Focus on "we" and you flow. That's when the swing you worked your butt off for finally shows up.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 71K followers, an engagement rate of 0.032%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 0.845% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.82% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.2K interactions, about 357x its own typical post.
- What is Alex Feinberg's engagement rate on X?
- Alex Feinberg (@Alexfeinberg) has an engagement rate of 0.032%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 71,251 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.032%, Alex Feinberg sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Alexfeinberg have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Alexfeinberg post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.