Back to @AlexandreVidal1's profile

Alexandre Vidal engagement report

@AlexandreVidal1 - 71K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 71K followers
Per impression
0.132%
760 views on a typical post
Reach
1.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 71K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 760 times each, and 0.132% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 324 interactions, about 324x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alexandre Vidal's engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Alexandre Vidal sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video4% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link96% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 96% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 23 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 29, 2023324x their median

    Que imagem! 😍 #CRF 📸 Alexandre Vidal / CRF https://t.co/RyXiDcWaf4

    31014004.2K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 2023104x their median

    23/07 https://t.co/ih6tt7HdAy

    972503.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 2023102x their median

    https://t.co/aM9wYkNkZq

    971403.2K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 202394x their median

    Predestinado 👑 💪🏽. #vidalfoto #alexandrevidalfotógrafo #crf #vamosflamengo #flamengo #mengo 📸 @alexandrevidalfotografo #alexandrevidalfotógrafo https://t.co/BcV2EZKk9Q

    904003.2K viewsView on X
  • Jan 8, 202693x their median

    Dia 08 de janeiro, dia do fotógrafo https://t.co/FstL4HwU7p

    921002.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202649x their median

    https://t.co/jClECx0GNU

    481001.5K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 202347x their median

    Com certeza um dos jogos inesquecível que eu tive a honra de eternizar em belas imagens 📸 27 de Julho de 2011, Santos 4 x 5 Flamengo. Fotos: Alexandre Vidal #alexandrevidalfotografo #flamengo #vilabelmiro #futebol #r10 #ronaldinho https://t.co/Ln4R3yiHyU

    433101.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202322x their median

    Feliz dia dos pais https://t.co/e1dXbuEc8b

    220001.4K viewsView on X
  • Apr 23, 202416x their median

    23/04/2024 📸 @AlexandreVidal1 https://t.co/fMU0GeJek3

    122201.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202314x their median

    https://t.co/DayqhVgcbm

    100404.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 71K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 760 times each, and 0.132% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 324 interactions, about 324x its own typical post.

What is Alexandre Vidal's engagement rate on X?
Alexandre Vidal (@AlexandreVidal1) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 70,612 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Alexandre Vidal sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AlexandreVidal1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AlexandreVidal1 post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going