Back to @AlanKrstic's profile

快门工luka engagement report

@AlanKrstic - 70K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.395%
of 70K followers
Per impression
1.38%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
28.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
260
interactions (median)
Saved
0.226%
42 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 260 interactions against 70K followers, an engagement rate of 0.395%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 4.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

快门工luka's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.395%, 快门工luka sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.68%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,881 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 68 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 20264.9x their median

    又是一名Tall Skinny https://t.co/HULtzhWv9M

    1.2K6513037K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20264.7x their median

    她跟我说最近苦练女上位,今天体验了一下确实进步很大 图片脸部经过ai重塑处理。 https://t.co/i7kCh2mxbl

    1.1K896041K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.7x their median

    素溪确实是个好女人,除了有点恋爱脑。 ◉常驻地:京津冀 ◉身高:174cm ◉鞋码:39码 人妻少妇,夫妻感情一般,长脸御姐长相,肥臀,buff叠满。 操素溪的感觉,只有一个词形容,那就是“过瘾”。她一被插入就双眼失焦,失去身体控制和表情管理,浑身瘫软无力。 在最开始的时候还会有所抵抗,象征性的拒绝。但是随着激烈的抽插,素溪的防线会快速崩塌,此时你在她身上做什么都行。

    667368155K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.2x their median

    继续空姐系列 https://t.co/sTjQ6KyaLz

    545297027K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.0x their median

    生日跟我差2天的女孩,腿长两米。 拍摄倒没什么好说的,只不过是跟平时一样。 晚上回到家,她给我发消息: “我自己来的北京,没地方住,我能去你家住吗?” 遇到这种事,千万别答应,因为如果认了门,之后的事情将会很棘手。于是我在我家附近开了个酒店。 她有着这个年龄段女孩特有的干净,以及胶原蛋白,不禁让我感叹女人最好的年龄果然是在20岁左右。 她不让我开灯,花白的身体,逆天的大长腿再月色的照耀下依然很显眼。我在她身上疯狂输出,一会儿把两条长腿扛在肩上,一会儿又把她的腿支起来,从我的视角看,达到脚底和脸同框的视角。 年轻的女孩子,身体代谢好,脚底离得近了,隐约的汗酸味挥之不去。感觉脚底的褶皱和脚趾缝里,都藏着酸味。深吸一口,直冲天灵盖。 事后她还给我吃了好吃的果脯,并且一定要送给我一袋。 之后的几天里,我去哪里她都想跟着我一起去,就像个小跟屁虫。最后我还是以尽量体面的方式跟她说明白,结束了这段关系。 我并非什么特好的人,她也会拥有他自己的人生。

    495248034K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20261.9x their median

    看脸根本看不出她有这么大的屁股 https://t.co/8LkJzCsEUY

    484185034K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20261.7x their median

    岚晞:我这脚为什么拍出来看那么大啊? 我:你脚本来就很大啊,怎么拍都小不了… https://t.co/KLyNsKhsgf

    402282021K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20261.5x their median

    大连女大的红润脚底 https://t.co/WlV3g2jff1

    375243012K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    用手帮岚晞的脚摆姿势,感觉隐隐约约有鞋的皮革味,触感还有点黏黏的。果然再声称自己脚不臭的人都抵挡不了光脚穿鞋。 岚晞很不好意思,说:“你快去洗洗手!”,我拒绝了。 最近教练课少,喜欢的可以预约起来。 https://t.co/hCAYxCPP2K

    318198024K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    亲近自然,分工明确。 https://t.co/TlUvsDb90s

    324124020K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 260 interactions against 70K followers, an engagement rate of 0.395%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 4.9x its own typical post.

What is 快门工luka's engagement rate on X?
快门工luka (@AlanKrstic) has an engagement rate of 0.395%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 69,584 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.395%, 快门工luka sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AlanKrstic have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AlanKrstic post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going