Back to @AkimAguilar's profile

AkimAguilar engagement report

@AkimAguilar - 425K followers on X

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.011%
of 425K followers
Per impression
0.34%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
3.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
49
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.3/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 49 interactions against 425K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 185K interactions, about 3778x its own typical post.

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #nuevafotodeperfil.

Compared with accounts its own size

AkimAguilar's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.011%, AkimAguilar sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video42% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 221 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 20263778x their median

    Toyota had just recreated iconic scene from Cars movie https://t.co/tYyv0cNriL

    164K20K3111.1K8.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20261044x their median

    No sé cuántos nenes africanos se quedaron sin agua, pero esta joya lo amerita. Lo siento https://t.co/i7oPLZmP5p

    47K3.6K4013335.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026752x their median

    I lost her again 🥀😔 https://t.co/iQZ0VokXcw

    31K5.0K3763451.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026720x their median

    This AI video is absolutely amazing 🔥 Seedance 2.5 https://t.co/UUBTC1blso

    31K3.1K4973262.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026630x their median

    Danna cumpliendo el sueño de muchos al besar a Belinda https://t.co/EaIgHI7uMz

    29K1.2K2372102.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026487x their median

    إيلون ماسك يزلزل عرش شركات الاتصالات العالمية بقرار تاريخي سينهي العصر التقليدي للإنترنت للأبد! 🚨 ​اشتراك واحد فقط في Starlink سيغطي إنترنت منزلك (شامل الراوتر) وهاتفك المحمول مباشرة من أسطول الأقمار الصناعية في الفضاء.. بدون وسطاء ولا شبكات محلية! ​وداعاً للمناطق الميتة وانقطاع التغطية في أي بقعة على كوكب الأرض! 🧵👇 https://t.co/HsuVF7Ap6u

    20K3.3K6361741.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026180x their median

    "OVNI": Porque piloto mexicano filma OVNI en forma de diamante volando bajo las nubes. https://t.co/FNDXgu0M9A

    8.3K4644429424K viewsView on X
  • Jul 6, 2026147x their median

    Pos bandita voy a ser papa, se llamara goku gracias . Manden todo su ki https://t.co/bFBZtvhIkt

    6.8K20215214204K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 202645x their median

    Extraño a mi primera ex

    2.3K837513326K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202614x their median

    SI YO SOY MARICABIRRIA https://t.co/THFustPhCM

    6736146291K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nuevafotodeperfil

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 49 interactions against 425K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.34% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 185K interactions, about 3778x its own typical post.

What is AkimAguilar's engagement rate on X?
AkimAguilar (@AkimAguilar) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 71 original posts from the last 30 days against 424,945 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.011%, AkimAguilar sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AkimAguilar have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AkimAguilar post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going