Back to @AiIdiots's profile

AI: Artificial Idiots engagement report

@AiIdiots - 251K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.079%
of 251K followers
Per impression
2.10%
9.4K views on a typical post
Reach
3.76%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
198
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 198 interactions against 251K followers, an engagement rate of 0.079%. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 2.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 68K interactions, about 344x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.079%, AI: Artificial Idiots sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 166 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 8, 2025344x their median

    Our military has captured two Chinese citizens who were fighting as part of the Russian army. This happened on Ukrainian territory—in the Donetsk region. Identification documents, bank cards, and personal data were found in their possession. We have information suggesting that there are many more Chinese citizens in the occupier's units than just these two. We are currently verifying all the facts—intelligence, the Security Service of Ukraine, and the relevant units of the Armed Forces are working on it. I have instructed the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine to immediately contact Beijing and clarify how China intends to respond to this. Russia's involvement of China, along with other countries, whether directly or indirectly, in this war in Europe is a clear signal that Putin intends to do anything but end the war. He is looking for ways to continue fighting. This definitely requires a response. A response from the United States, Europe, and all those around the world who want peace. The captured Chinese citizens are now in the custody of the Security Service of Ukraine. Relevant investigative and operational actions are ongoing.

    49K12K5.3K1.8K6.0M viewsView on X
  • Feb 19, 20265.5x their median

    Naše dcera Anežka🦄 před rokem onemocněla rakovinou. Poslední nadějí v boji se zhoubným melanomem je pro ní léčba dendritickými buňkami na klinice v Kölnu. Z celého srdce ❤️děkujeme všem, kteří sbírku podpoří. Prosíme sdílejte naší prosbu dál. 🙏 https://t.co/h9gXP1m4Ln

    67837239947K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20265.2x their median

    Jaroslav Foldyna byl dnes jmenován vládním zmocněncem pro domácí násilí.

    9893611113K viewsView on X
  • Mar 2, 20263.8x their median

    Ministerstvo zahraniční doporučilo občanům, kteří uvízli na Blízkém východě, aby zachovali klid a sledovali prohlášení ministra Macinky u Xavera.

    717304012K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20263.7x their median

    Prezident a další sportovní legenda https://t.co/0reAobRnPM

    6992112116K viewsView on X
  • Mar 7, 20252.6x their median

    Radek Vondráček chce Ukrajině půjčovat peníze https://t.co/PBk3VSrict

    39770311224K viewsView on X
  • May 9, 20252.3x their median

    Fico se vítá se svými příznivci po návratu z Moskvy https://t.co/WmNcHUogDj

    408271208.8K viewsView on X
  • Apr 23, 20252.0x their median

    Filip Turek má hned několik škol https://t.co/ejgQWzfK0k

    3264411620K viewsView on X
  • Feb 5, 20261.7x their median

    Pan Macinka má za sebou také odvážné zahraniční mise. https://t.co/jVBDwudOfP

    2843510419K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20261.7x their median

    Poslechněte si náš nový song Vlastenec z dovozu. Věnovali jsme ho jednomu Japonci z Wishe. https://t.co/Pj6Da64Kdb

    267575316K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 198 interactions against 251K followers, an engagement rate of 0.079%. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 2.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 68K interactions, about 344x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is AI: Artificial Idiots's engagement rate on X?
AI: Artificial Idiots (@AiIdiots) has an engagement rate of 0.079%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 251,136 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.079%, AI: Artificial Idiots sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AiIdiots have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @AiIdiots post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going