Back to @AiForAmericans's profile

Ai for Americans engagement report

@AiForAmericans - 278K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.082%
of 278K followers
Per impression
4.44%
5.1K views on a typical post
Reach
1.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
227
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 227 interactions against 278K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.1K times each, and 4.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.1K interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ai for Americans's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.082%, Ai for Americans sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 261 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 3, 20269.4x their median

    https://t.co/hnsZPy43zm

    2.0K14615838K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20265.5x their median

    Left or Right? https://t.co/CKWqIYRMYe

    1.1K77711158K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20264.3x their median

    https://t.co/tMaDHvOmLU

    910505360K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20261.8x their median

    https://t.co/pGUzAaKOW3

    3431944718K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    🚨 TEXAS FREEZES NEW DATA CENTER GRID CONNECTIONS AS AI POWER DEMAND SURGES Texas has halted new grid connections for data centers as the state investigates whether massive electricity requests from proposed AI facilities represent real projects. Power requests from data centers and other large users in Texas have surged from roughly 48 GW in 2023 to more than 474 GW today, raising concerns over “ghost demand” from projects that may never actually get built.

    18867309.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    🚨 BREAKING: California Tightens Social Media Rules for Kids California has banned behaviorally addictive social media features for children under 16 and prohibited AI companion chatbots in toys.

    18527519.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    🚨 BREAKING: Trump Says AI Concerns Are Being Exaggerated Donald Trump said “very negative forces” are raising exaggerated concerns about AI, as fears over the technology’s potential risks continue to grow.

    182572110K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026

    🚨 BREAKING: US Banks Restrict AI Agents Citi, Bank of America and JPMorgan are blocking AI agents from accessing customer accounts over security concerns and fears that bots could move billions in deposits to higher-yield accounts.

    18127215.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    🚨 BREAKING: Kioxia Eyes U.S. Listing Amid AI Chip Boom Kioxia’s planned U.S. listing could put the Japanese memory chipmaker back in the global AI spotlight as demand for AI memory continues to surge.

    17147909.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    🚨 BREAKING: Anthropic CEO Calls for Slowing the AI Race Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei says AI is advancing faster than safety measures can keep up, calling for steps to “slow the pace” of developing more powerful systems.

    16857729.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 227 interactions against 278K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.1K times each, and 4.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.1K interactions, about 9.4x its own typical post.

What is Ai for Americans's engagement rate on X?
Ai for Americans (@AiForAmericans) has an engagement rate of 0.082%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 277,644 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.082%, Ai for Americans sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AiForAmericans have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AiForAmericans post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going