AI Breakfast engagement report
@AiBreakfast - 240K followers on X
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 54 interactions against 240K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 0.573% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.7K interactions, about 105x its own typical post.
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.022%, AI Breakfast sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 120.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 56% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 22% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 188 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 26, 2026105x their median
JUST IN: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman reveals humanity is “close to creating a genie that can grant any wish.”
- Jul 11, 2026103x their median
Pizza Hut website in 1996 https://t.co/3tuQ1iZXzD
- Apr 10, 202350x their median
At this rate we'll probably see GPT-6 before GTA 6
- Oct 13, 202331x their median
When OpenAI releases Autonomous Agents, it will be like an intelligent swarm of bees clicking around on the internet. Sending emails, negotiating, making products, purchases, fulfilling orders, etc. It will fundamentally change the internet, and this cannot be overstated.
- Jul 21, 202620x their median
Today we launch the next chapter of Gushwork. Over the last 30 years, we saw commerce moving online - But what actually moved online were low value retail products: books, clothing, electronics. Anything high value, from $5,000 to $1M - a hydraulic crane, an industrial roofing contract, a heat shrink machine - still runs predominantly on human buyer seller conversations. And conversation was the one thing software couldn't do. That just changed. We are bringing 35 million sellers of high value products & services in the physical economy to the agentic web - One of the largest categories of commerce that barely moved online in the internet before AI.
- Jul 28, 202611x their median
Anthropic has to understand that the days of gate-kept $200/month plans are over kimi k3 dropped its full weight yesterday — the world's first open-weight model in the 2.8T-parameter class MiniMax is expected to follow almost immediately with its own 2-3T open model no moat left
- Aug 3, 20267.5x their median
The models are improving the models. Locus, our automated AI research system, is SOTA on PostTrainBench and post-trains Qwen3 base models that surpass the human post-trained Qwen3 model. Today, LLMs post-trained end-to-end by Locus are in production to millions. 🧵👇 PostTrainBench evaluates agents' ability to post-train models on various domains given 10 H100 hours. We extend PostTrainBench via PostTrainBench+, which has a greatly expanded compute budget that provides clearer signal on automated post-training capabilities. We find that thousands of H100 hours help distinguish methods' performance post-training Qwen3 1.7B-Base models, and that Locus scales best. In this setting, modes trained by Locus collectively surpass the perforamce of the offical human post-trained Qwen3 1.7B model. In a test of generalization, we ran Locus on all live Kaggle competitions with prize money and public leaderboards. After 16 days, Locus achieved the 4th highest average rank among all participants.
- Sep 6, 20265.9x their median
Your coworker next year when you finish trade school: https://t.co/8CAZpRFWDi
- Sep 4, 20265.8x their median
How about now @sama? https://t.co/1hfqmrSZGm
- Jul 17, 20262.1x their median
Don’t get too excited, you’d need about 8x H100s to run Kimi 3 locally
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 54 interactions against 240K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 0.573% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.93% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.7K interactions, about 105x its own typical post.
- What is AI Breakfast's engagement rate on X?
- AI Breakfast (@AiBreakfast) has an engagement rate of 0.022%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 239,751 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.022%, AI Breakfast sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,864 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AiBreakfast have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @AiBreakfast post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.