Ahmed Baba engagement report
@AhmedBaba_ - 103K followers on X
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 103K followers, an engagement rate of 0.056%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 4.47% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 17% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.7K interactions, about 150x its own typical post.
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 15, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Ahmed Baba's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.056%, Ahmed Baba sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 89% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 272 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 29, 2026150x their median
BREAKING: Anthropic warns in their IPO filing their technology may lead to "humanity losing control over civilization entirely"
- Sep 27, 202556x their median
Jennings: Biden in a politico story, was reported to have been fuming to anyone who would listen that Garland was not moving fast enough Mockler: He was publicly fuming privately? https://t.co/RPzGAFrqQV
- Sep 10, 202641x their median
Next week, Trump's DOJ is back in court seeking to revive the dismissed indictments of James Comey & Letitia James. When Comey was first indicted, Scott Jennings defended it on CNN. I debunked his deflections live. The truth: Trump's abuses of power are the worst in US history. https://t.co/c2II6fBtfJ
- Oct 2, 20266.2x their median
Cornell police omitted Jane Doe's claim that she was raped from their summary of her statement submitted to the DA. The DA closed the case without requesting the transcripts. It was either malpractice or it was intentional, and it tainted the investigation. They failed her. https://t.co/RcjjC5aZ0Q
- Oct 4, 20264.8x their median
The Cornell rape case is a microcosm of a much bigger issue. This is a systemic, legal, and cultural problem we have to tackle head-on. Consent laws that protect abusers need to change. And men, we need to raise our sons to know what consent really is. Because this ain't it. https://t.co/RuMgPMhaJg
- Sep 9, 20263.6x their median
Whether you believe the worst-case AI predictions or not, we're way beyond the threshold worthy of robust regulation. The self-organized AI swarm hack of Hugging Face has taken the risks to new levels, making these existential warnings more credible. We need to move.
- Sep 23, 20263.1x their median
Nearly 60% of the senior officers Pete Hegseth has fired are Black or female. But they make up fewer than 20% of generals and admirals. His anti-DEI purges clearly targeted Black, female, and trans officers. They were highly qualified. Hegseth is the unqualified one. https://t.co/YY99QT2FLw
- Sep 13, 20263.0x their median
People are saying “something terrible happened that they’re not telling us” and that’s why Dario, Musk, and Altman all agree we should pace AI development. No, it’s been happening out in the open. Clearly, a lot of people are just now tuning into this technology. It’s the concerning leaps in AI progress, as most recently evidenced by the self-organizing AI agent swarm that hacked Hugging Face. Dario mentioned it in his essay. Not sure how more people don’t know about it.
- Oct 13, 20262.5x their median
Kimberly Guilfoyle was just the tip of the Trump Admin corruption iceberg. Her firing was a desperate attempt to save face ahead of the midterms. If they truly rooted out corruption, there would be barely anyone left working in this White House - with Trump being the first out.
- Sep 13, 20262.2x their median
It’s always frustrating to spot a grifter early, get heat for calling them out, and then everyone catches on to the con after damage has already been done. It’s especially frustrating when that grifter is allegedly “on your side.”
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 58 interactions against 103K followers, an engagement rate of 0.056%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 4.47% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.25% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 17% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.7K interactions, about 150x its own typical post.
- What is Ahmed Baba's engagement rate on X?
- Ahmed Baba (@AhmedBaba_) has an engagement rate of 0.056%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 103,186 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.056%, Ahmed Baba sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AhmedBaba_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @AhmedBaba_ post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.