Back to @AgencyLaser's profile

LASER engagement report

@AgencyLaser - 343K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.097%
of 343K followers
Per impression
1.14%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
8.52%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
333
interactions (median)
Saved
0.003%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.73/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 333 interactions against 343K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 645 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #memecoin, #crypto.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026. Recurring tags: #memecoin, #crypto.

Compared with accounts its own size

LASER's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 51% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.097%, LASER sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video59% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link12% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 59% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 232 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 20261.9x their median

    Next big crypto project is??

    31837286438K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.9x their median

    🐱 $CATE is building something worth watching. In a space where community can make or break a project, $CATE is putting engagement, participation, and long-term growth at the center. 🌱 The community is still growing, making this an interesting stage to start paying attention and follow the journey early. πŸ‘€ πŸ“ CA: Ai66LHZG9MCzg1WKdawwqduVAXpNDUuV8M3uyq5ppump Follow @CateonSol_ for updates and see where this community-driven movement goes next. πŸš€ #CATE #Solana #Memecoin #Crypto

    47511050228K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    What’s your 1 #crypto project?

    23731210329K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    Your favorite #memecoin right now??

    28825158129K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    Next billion dollar #memecoin?

    23513209532K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    Next big crypto project is?

    2338212631K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    Next big #crypto project is?

    2148191850K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    What's your top 1 crypto project?

    2228186251K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026

    What's your favorite #coin right now?

    2114179650K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    πŸ” The verdict is in… and it was unanimous. πŸ₯‡ The judges have officially made their call, putting $CHUMP in the spotlight. CA: 0x0E0d2C89a5a019FE1cF762e5e33187631DACC21B With @ChumpCoinX behind it, this is definitely one to keep an eye on as the story develops. πŸ‘€ Curious to see what comes next for $CHUMP. πŸ”₯

    3252942263K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#memecoin#crypto

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 333 interactions against 343K followers, an engagement rate of 0.097%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 1.14% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.73 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 645 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #memecoin, #crypto.

What is LASER's engagement rate on X?
LASER (@AgencyLaser) has an engagement rate of 0.097%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 343,193 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.097%, LASER sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AgencyLaser have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AgencyLaser post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going