Back to @AfterRMC's profile

After Foot RMC engagement report

@AfterRMC - 799K followers on X

Measured over 111 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.02%
of 799K followers
Per impression
0.555%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
3.66%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
162
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.77/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 162 interactions against 799K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 111 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.555% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 111 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

Measured over 111 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tag: #rmclive.

Compared with accounts its own size

After Foot RMC's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.02%, After Foot RMC sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,787 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 233 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 26, 202628x their median

    🗣️🇪🇦 @edgar_groleau : "Le match de Lamine Yamal est exceptionnel ce soir. Il est terrifiant. On a vu l'une de ses meilleures versions ce soir. Son niveau était impressionnant. Pour les prix comme le Ballon d'Or, il a un avantage, c'est le joueur le plus magique au monde." https://t.co/AA1pe486NT

    4.0K4677424108K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202613x their median

    🔥🇫🇷 @Adem_djouadi : "Zidane ne doit pas construire son équipe autour de Mbappé. Il n'a pas la légitimité sportive pour dire à Dembélé de courir pour lui, il n'a pas la la légitimité sportive de demander à Olise de courir pour lui." https://t.co/iD0yxQMfjX

    1.2K1764412661.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20268.6x their median

    🔥⚪🔵 @EltoMok : "Bruno Génésio sera le meilleur coach de la saison. Et l'OM sera sur le podium." https://t.co/kihC1jcF72

    1.2K9011437154K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20267.6x their median

    🗣💬 "Ça fait partie du football de chambrer mais il faut quand même rester mesuré à un certain moment. Il ne voulait limite pas s'arrêter. Mais, au bout d'un moment, stop." @samumtiti regrette les incessantes provocations de Guendouzi envers les supporters de l'OL. https://t.co/mTJgr8hGEC

    8977223036518K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20267.5x their median

    🗣️ "Sortir le Ballon d’Or et un candidat au Ballon d’Or à la mi-temps montre encore une fois l’exigence et l’importance de Luis Enrique. Même après un back to back, il n’y a pas de cadeaux." 👏 @walidacherchour salue les choix du coach parisien face au Stade Rennais. https://t.co/7AXP4WRRUQ

    1.1K12325261K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20266.8x their median

    "Si vous voulez parier sur qui va être le champion, on peut parier", la sortie de Luis Enrique est-elle déplacée ? 💥 "Ses propos sont indécents", estime @DanielRiolo. https://t.co/EcSJ3cHrXp

    72010523349599K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20266.0x their median

    Gros débat en plateau concernant le match de Mbappé. - @DanielRiolo : "Sans Mbappé il y a 0-0 et la France ne gagne pas le match. Il n'y a personne qui marque un but dans cette équipe." - @jltourre : "S'il marque, c'est aussi parce que les autres ont fait le jeu, le pressing..." https://t.co/bPcGpcjYrV

    6934919539389K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20265.5x their median

    🔴🟡 @Menehem02 "Moi, si j’étais Frank McCourt, je me dirais : 'Mais regardez ce que Joseph Oughourlian a réussi en investissant 80 millions d’euros.' Il a investi dix fois moins que lui et a stabilisé et restructuré son club.” https://t.co/F80lBkIzFb

    713639820202K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.3x their median

    ❌ @walidacherchour : "Daniel, à un moment donné, le football c'est de l'argent. Camara et Zakaria ont des gros salaires et font le job. Du côté marseillais, t'as donné des sous à des mecs qui te crèvent à tous les matchs !" 🗣️ Gros débat sur l'OM dans l'After ! https://t.co/gfSDHKr6pJ

    7805716383K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.8x their median

    Maxime Chanot sur les débuts de Genesio à l'OM : "Je pensais qu'il allait ramener du calme, de la sérénité et la semaine dernière, il pète un boulon sur sa direction pour une histoire qui arrive à chaque mercato." #RMCLive https://t.co/87PuRYpFm3

    1338508125765K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#rmclive

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 162 interactions against 799K followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 111 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.555% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 111 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.5K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

What is After Foot RMC's engagement rate on X?
After Foot RMC (@AfterRMC) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 111 original posts from the last 30 days against 798,697 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.02%, After Foot RMC sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,787 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AfterRMC have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AfterRMC post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going