Back to @AethirCloud's profile

Aethir engagement report

@AethirCloud - 680K followers on X

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 680K followers
Per impression
1.10%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
2.31%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
176
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.13/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 176 interactions against 680K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 627 interactions, about 3.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 33 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Aethir's engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, Aethir sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video85% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 375 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 18, 20263.6x their median

    AI compute is getting tokenized, and @binance just listed these names, including @AxeCompute as a rising neocloud. This listing shows the market's continued recognition of Axe Compute's GPU-as-a-Service business in 2026. Congrats to Axe Compute on the AGPU listing on Binance Futures. https://t.co/OJfQS0T5rb

    5942110224K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.9x their median

    Introducing Aethir ACCELERATE: Aethir is making its largest move into physical AI infrastructure to date. Access secured to 10 initial sites, with up to 20MW of total capacity. Optimized for NVIDIA B300 and GB300 clusters of 64 to 256 nodes. Sites are located across the US and Europe. The numbers: up to $700 million in contracts projected by the end of 2026. Over $2 billion in total contract value once all 10 sites are fully built out. For four years, the decentralized GPU cloud model was defined by what it didn't own. That ends here. Aethir’s network is now entering the data center business with its own GPU capacity. The timeline is in months, instead of years. The full breakdown is in our latest blog👇

    33984742145K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.7x their median

    Aethir ACCELERATE has already secured 10 mid-sized data center sites, with up to 20MW, across the US and Europe. The data centers will bring up to $700M in contracts by the end of 2026, and $2B+ at full buildout. Aethir’s decentralized compute network is moving into physical AI infrastructure, while retaining its distributed compute services. Read our new blog for all the details👇

    4211827220K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.5x their median

    This year was incredible for Axe Compute. What began as Predictive Oncology has become one of the standout neoclouds in the market, with shares up nearly 590% over six months and a 52-week range now stretching from $1.04 to $12. Behind the numbers: $3B in closed business and $6B worth more in the pipeline. A genuinely impressive transformation from an oncology research firm into a serious AI infrastructure player. https://t.co/pyFdPV7UYq

    4021425423K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.5x their median

    Egress fees add 15-30% to a typical AI cloud bill, charged not for compute, but for taking your own data back. It is the tax that makes leaving expensive. That is the point of it. Aethir charges zero egress. Your data, your models, your exit, free to move, always. https://t.co/pKeTlI1c4u

    3962026213K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.4x their median

    NVIDIA is buying Hugging Face for $12.9B. Against ~$150M revenue, that’s ~86x. It isn’t buying revenue, it’s buying AI model distribution: the layer where 18M developers pick a default. Read our new blog for all the details👇 https://t.co/RDrgeqw3t1

    3881913016K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.3x their median

    Axe Compute closed the Helomics sale and went all-in on GPU-as-a-Service. The company moved from a $260 million contract in April to more than $3 billion in signed contract value in 2026 by late July. The company's shift from a small oncology research company to a Nasdaq-listed neocloud platform has been fast, driven by numerous high-value GPU compute contracts. Explore @AxeCompute’s build model, the order book, and the company's milestones in our new blog👇

    381157117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.8x their median

    On Monday, Verona makes its biggest announcement of the year, and the next afternoon our team will walk you through it in person. We're hosting on September 29 at Spark Plus Seolleung, with @GoKiteAI, @AethirCloud, @openroboto, and @De1_ai as co-hosts. https://t.co/KPzsD5bGwa

    12879881730K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20261.7x their median

    Axe Compute (NASDAQ: AGPU) signs its largest deal yet: a $1.5B five-year contract for a 9,200+ GPU Blackwell cluster. Total 2026 signed contracted value now exceeds $3 billion. $534M in customer prepayments expected. Aethir Foundation is Axe Compute’s largest shareholder.

    2135728634K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    The AI overbuild debate isn’t about how much capacity gets built. It’s about what gets built first: the site, or the customer. Aethir ACCELERATOR’s approach is to build capacity based on actual compute demand🧵 https://t.co/o8aDUXcy4d

    1832031119K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 176 interactions against 680K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 33 original posts, its engagement rate beats 48% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 33 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 627 interactions, about 3.6x its own typical post.

What is Aethir's engagement rate on X?
Aethir (@AethirCloud) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 33 original posts from the last 30 days against 680,416 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, Aethir sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AethirCloud have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 48% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AethirCloud post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going