AestheticGamer aka Dusk Golem engagement report
@AestheticGamer1 - 96K followers on X
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 17, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 242 interactions against 96K followers, an engagement rate of 0.254%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.855% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 166x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #residentevil, #residentevilㅤ, #filmtwitter.
Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 17, 2026. Recurring tags: #residentevil, #residentevilㅤ, #filmtwitter.
Compared with accounts its own size
AestheticGamer aka Dusk Golem's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.254%, AestheticGamer aka Dusk Golem sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.146% |
| 75th percentile | 0.697% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 44% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 8% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 8% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 232 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 11, 2026166x their median
Teenage Sex and Death at Camp Miasma has overtaken Obsession as 2026's highest-rated horror movie with a 98% Rotten Tomatoes score https://t.co/rUV4KE2DJ1
- Aug 10, 202647x their median
"toby fox basically stole everything from [lists two dozen different games and other pieces of media and people he's known and communities he's been in and experiences he's lived through and dreams he's had]"
- Aug 10, 202622x their median
Obsession is coming to Halloween Horror Nights! Nikki will be roaming the park, and Art the Clown is also confirmed to be roaming the park again! #HHN https://t.co/NUy503wQ5O
- Sep 15, 202619x their median
The first scene of the first Scream movie genuinely wrecks me every time I watch it. Like it's legit upsetting to me. I just don't want her to die
- Sep 16, 202618x their median
After digging through over hundred impressions, I do think we're unfortunately about to live in a reality where many Resident Evil fans are probably about to really like the Zach Cregger film, & the fucking RE fanbase scared Cregger off from ever wanting to do another one again.
- Sep 16, 202612x their median
(1/??) Alright, the first screenings of Zach Cregger's Resident Evil movie are just finishing up right now, & first impressions are starting to trickle in. This is a thread summarizing & linking to impressions from both casual audience & more official press types from tonight. https://t.co/eh6lfCU7r3
- Mar 17, 20269.9x their median
(1/2) I've had an influx of new followers, so let me be clear: -I'm a humanist, atheist, heavy left wing swinging but not a democrat -I don't judge people by what they are, but who they choose to be -🏳️⚧️Trans rights are human rights, fuck off if you disagree -I swear & blab a lot
- Aug 22, 20269.9x their median
💥 These 4 iconic antagonists get into a FIGHT to the death. WHO is walking out alive? 👇 https://t.co/eB1rZIM85P
- Aug 18, 20269.3x their median
Silent Hill f (2025) https://t.co/9BAhC7EV6Z
- Sep 15, 20269.1x their median
Assisti Resident Evil, mas ainda não posso falar o que achei dele, o que eu posso dizer é: comprem seus ingressos! Eles já estão a venda!! https://t.co/U4RwhWSqs9
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 242 interactions against 96K followers, an engagement rate of 0.254%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.855% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 8% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 40K interactions, about 166x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #residentevil, #residentevilㅤ, #filmtwitter.
- What is AestheticGamer aka Dusk Golem's engagement rate on X?
- AestheticGamer aka Dusk Golem (@AestheticGamer1) has an engagement rate of 0.254%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 96,345 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.254%, AestheticGamer aka Dusk Golem sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AestheticGamer1 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @AestheticGamer1 post?
- Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.23 posts per day across the measured window.