Back to @Adweek's profile

ADWEEK engagement report

@Adweek - 661K followers on X

Measured over 100 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 661K followers
Per impression
0.102%
2.9K views on a typical post
Reach
0.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.97/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 661K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 100 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 0.102% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.444% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 100 posts sampled, 51% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 79% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 376 interactions, about 125x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #brandweek, #ai, #honeydeuce.

Measured over 100 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #brandweek, #ai, #honeydeuce.

Compared with accounts its own size

ADWEEK's engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, ADWEEK sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,567 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video51% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link79% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 51% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 79% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 287 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 2026125x their median

    .@tkelce is taking his career off the gridiron to new heights. The @Chiefs tight end is partnering with @Publicis_SE and 3 Arts Sports to launch TEKTA, an offering that helps brands connect with collegiate athletes for name, image, and likeness (NIL) deals across all sports. Instead of forcing brands to coordinate separately with athlete representatives, universities, conferences, and creative and production teams, TEKTA is designed to streamline the process into one operating model. Read more 👉 https://t.co/9kvo8Zo0Se

    329424114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 202619x their median

    The August issue of ADWEEK Is here Creators aren’t just posting anymore, they’re building whole businesses. @MrBeast just crossed 500M @YouTube subscribers, but the bigger story is what comes after the views. Creators restructuring into parent companies, launching products and studios, and attracting real institutional capital. With brands set to spend $21B on creators in 2026, the gap between traditional publisher revenue and creator earnings is shrinking fast, and the playbook is clear: build the audience on platforms you don’t own, then build the companies you do. 📝 @MarkStenberg3 🎨 @AnaMiminoshvili

    1240318.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202618x their median

    .@Fanta has unveiled its Haunted Universe, a new world of entertainment including four new characters, storytelling, and live and digital experiences that will run through Halloween season and beyond. Learn more 👉 https://t.co/QL99sWHV0H https://t.co/bK9Riz9Qm5

    71281948K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202615x their median

    This month's cover star is @NBA player, philanthropist, and business owner Jaylen Brown 🏀 He's not the first player in the league to have launched a sneaker brand, but he is the first to do so in this new era of social media fandom and direct-to-consumer marketing. https://t.co/qSJpYBBEBX

    1626207.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202614x their median

    .@LiquidDeath, Garage Beer, and Jason Kelce really, really, REALLY want you to reduce, reuse, and recycle ♻️ https://t.co/vOfjS1kILU https://t.co/cD5KWgXFu6

    2910308.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202613x their median

    AI video-generation startup Runway has launched a new AI agent that can recreate existing ads, spin out variations, localize them for other markets, and publish the human-approved versions. https://t.co/oK6WKHHno2

    298016.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20269.0x their median

    .@Snickers has launched https://t.co/Y31CcvJphL, a digital evolution of the famous “You’re Not You When You’re Hungry” campaign, and a candy bar built to feed artificial intelligence when it delivers poor or overly agreeable answers. Read more 👉 https://t.co/v4AykunFq6 https://t.co/ywD8YVs1Tf

    171639.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20267.3x their median

    .@WPP is facing mounting legal trouble tied to allegations that executives at its media buying arm GroupM, now WPP Media, used an illegal rebate system for years. https://t.co/H2n6Q7TReV

    154129.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20267.3x their median

    The @FTC has sued @amazon over what it calls deceptive and unfair advertising practices.The lawsuit alleges Amazon overcharged about 1.2 million advertisers by manipulating ad-auction rules, generating more than $20 billion from these practices since 2019. https://t.co/JoakH6XTVZ

    152326.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20266.7x their median

    Some business owners don't know this, but @YoBenCohen is spreading the word that you CAN build a business and care about people at the same time... ad agency not required 😉 https://t.co/C5X9g1kWpL

    162204.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#brandweek#ai#honeydeuce#iphoneduo

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 661K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 100 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.9K times each, and 0.102% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.444% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 100 posts sampled, 51% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 79% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 376 interactions, about 125x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #brandweek, #ai, #honeydeuce.

What is ADWEEK's engagement rate on X?
ADWEEK (@Adweek) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 100 original posts from the last 30 days against 661,111 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, ADWEEK sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Adweek have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Adweek post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going