Back to @Adikastakes's profile

Adika engagement report

@Adikastakes - 282K followers on X

Measured over 81 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.15%
of 282K followers
Per impression
7.42%
41K views on a typical post
Reach
15.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.057%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.6/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 3.0K interactions against 282K followers, an engagement rate of 1.15%. Measured over 81 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 7.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 81 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 186K interactions, about 62x its own typical post.

Measured over 81 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tag: #ucl.

Compared with accounts its own size

Adika's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.15%, Adika sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video46% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 46% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 138 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 202662x their median

    https://t.co/qUbKXV9wfl

    167K18K2631.1K4.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20269.0x their median

    You cannot even compare the case to Chelsea’s own. Chelsea went and reported themselves to the Premier League. Man City has been denying guilt ever since they were charged.

    25K2.0K12444265K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20258.4x their median

    In life, in death oh lord abide with me.

    23K2.0K3046411M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20267.1x their median

    na fraud dem use get Aguero moment, no pressure yourself this year

    17K3.7K279315634K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20267.0x their median

    Valverde's shot power 😯 Bravery from Bisseck 💪 #UCL https://t.co/OtdBws2PCM

    19K1.4K326265668K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20264.8x their median

    Manchester City is FINISHED! They have been found guilty of 114 charges and could be relegated, stripped of Premier League titles or even expelled from the league. They Cheated and deserve very severe punishment! https://t.co/wa5pzoG3pC

    13K1.2K32152247K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20264.6x their median

    Il y a un grand absent parmi les 30 nominés au Ballon d’Or. Une absence qui va faire parler et à juste titre.

    13K3834233632.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.5x their median

    Villa haven’t been able to score a single goal in the Premier League this season but they have now scored 3 goals in less than 45 minutes away from home vs Club Brugge. The gap in quality between the Premier League and other leagues is ridiculous.

    9.8K5369742181K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.4x their median

    I always said it that there's absolutely no way that Man City is found not guilty of 115 charges

    9.6K50811018109K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.1x their median

    Wait Pedri did not make the top 30 of the Ballon D’or???😳

    8.7K28027966144K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ucl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.0K interactions against 282K followers, an engagement rate of 1.15%. Measured over 81 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 7.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 81 posts sampled, 46% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 186K interactions, about 62x its own typical post.

What is Adika's engagement rate on X?
Adika (@Adikastakes) has an engagement rate of 1.15%, based on the median interactions across 81 original posts from the last 30 days against 282,234 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.15%, Adika sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Adikastakes have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Adikastakes post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going