Back to @Acyn's profile

Acyn engagement report

@Acyn - 787K followers on X

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.029%
of 787K followers
Per impression
0.722%
31K views on a typical post
Reach
3.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
225
interactions (median)
Saved
0.035%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.93/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 225 interactions against 787K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 0.722% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 142x its own typical post.

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tag: #dementiajtrump.

Compared with accounts its own size

Acyn's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.029%, Acyn sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,449 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video99% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 99% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 255 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 2026142x their median

    El-Sayed: Why would you invite JD Vance? We don’t have more couches here than they do in Ohio. https://t.co/Hmb6dCDRBv

    29K1.8K2944456.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026101x their median

    El-Sayed: Well, I’ll tell you this. Every time J.D. Vance opens his mouth, the first two things I can think are, man, that guy is boring. And second, Peter Thiel had to spend a ton of money to get that man elected, barely in the state of Ohio.  But the confusing thing about it is that he thinks that there are some people who are more American than others because they can point to their Papaw who was here earlier. And my question to him is simply, why is it then, how do you look your parents-in-law in the eye and say that somehow they’re less American than you are? Because that’s what he’s implying there. But bigger picture, this is about trying to change the channel. They’re trying to dissuade us from actually paying attention to the issues that we see laid bare when we talk about our kitchen table budget every single month. My name and my background aren’t raising your gas prices. That’s what the Trump administration is doing. My name and my background aren’t picking trade wars to increase your costs. That’s what the Trump administration is doing. My name and my background aren’t the reason you can’t see a doctor. That’s because of the Medicaid cuts and the ACA cuts that are about to come down the pike next year because of what the Trump administration is doing. So if you don’t want to talk about what you’re doing, that’s fine, but I encourage you to leave my name and my background out of it. This is an America that’s big enough for all of us, even if J.D. Vance doesn’t agree, except for the fact that he actually understands and benefits from the nature of immigration and the fact that we are a bigger country because we are inclusive of people who don’t have Papaws who were here 50 years ago.

    19K3.4K408131811K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202640x their median

    Shapiro: When he sits behind the desk in the Oval Office, making $2.2 billion off his corruption for him and his kids, it costs you money. That money came out of somebody else’s pocket to go into his. When he sits behind that desk, he’s not thinking about how to put money in your pocket. He’s thinking about how to put money in his own pocket.

    7.0K1.9K11627135K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202627x their median

    Fox pointing out this is not the first time that Trump has promised cash payments: He promised Americans $2000 rebate during his tariff policy when that was enacted, but those $2000 checks so far have not materialized. https://t.co/4KH7VUIjCT

    4.6K1.1K188105986K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202626x their median

    Oz prevents RFK JR from walking back to his spot https://t.co/OqG8QP3vB6

    4.7K5874662053.2M viewsView on X
  • Apr 8, 202325x their median

    I’ve only been able to keep up with all the events this week by capturing and posting clips through @Snapstream. If your organization needs to keep up with and respond to the news cycle, you can learn more here: https://t.co/677bA6FWOJ

    4.3K1.2K06440M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202623x their median

    Abdul El-Sayed will appear on Jesse Watters Primetime on Monday according to Fox https://t.co/EY4cOIUNIF

    4.4K328176134634K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202620x their median

    Q: How many individuals take advantage of birth tourism? Trump: I'll tell you right now, hundreds of thousands. You have one man came in with a family had said he had 56 children. Another one came in—they said they had 98 children https://t.co/8vgLW38cg5

    2.3K5001.3K456708K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202614x their median

    Jennings: I think it's pretty standard practice for administrations to do PSAs Collins: What is the public service announcement in the ad? Jennings: Warning against communism sounds like a public service to me Collins: But that came as he had the red carpet rolled out for a communist leader

    2.6K438612480K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202612x their median

    Matthews: When I was working on the campaign for a year, and then at the White House for the last seven months of the first administration, the only person I never met was Melania Trump. It was this known thing that she was just not around, and she didn’t want to be around. It’s been reported that Melania gets paid for showing up at events when they were on the campaign trail, which is crazy to think that you have to pay your own wife to show up somewhere. I can guarantee that Melania does not like the Natalie Harp story being out there in the news… And so I think—I imagine her rate has gone up now, given all the news happening this week.

    2.3K4243813275K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dementiajtrump

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 225 interactions against 787K followers, an engagement rate of 0.029%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 0.722% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.96% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 99% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 142x its own typical post.

What is Acyn's engagement rate on X?
Acyn (@Acyn) has an engagement rate of 0.029%, based on the median interactions across 76 original posts from the last 30 days against 787,185 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.029%, Acyn sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Acyn have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Acyn post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going