Action Network engagement report
@ActionNetworkHQ - 260K followers on X
Measured over 75 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 260K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 75 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.239% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 75 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 387 interactions, about 14x its own typical post.
Measured over 75 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Action Network's engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.011%, Action Network sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 91% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 41% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 41% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 348 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 23, 202614x their median
Teams who start 0-2 SU and ATS, who are dogs in Week 3 facing an opponent who have a SU or ATS win, are 28-14 ATS since 2015 ๐ In Week 3 this applies to: โช๏ธFalcons (+5.5) at Packers โช๏ธDolphins (+11.5) vs Chiefs โช๏ธChargers (+7) at Bills โช๏ธBucs (+1.5) vs Vikings (via @EvanHAbrams)
- Sep 7, 202610x their median
Ole Miss had a 96% chance of covering while up 14 with 6 minutes left in the 4thโฆ Louisville then scored 2 TDs in the final 5 minutes, forcing Ole Miss to kick a late FG. ๐ณ https://t.co/qwS9Ojz1Ig
- Sep 24, 20269.1x their median
The Packers (-4.5) are currently receiving 54% of bets but only 27% of money to cover tonight vs the Falcons. Atlanta has moved from +7 all the way down to +4.5 since Penix was announced as the starter ๐ https://t.co/GDQTXxebTq
- Sep 8, 20265.4x their median
The Blue Jays (-210) were both the largest favorite and most bet team on the MLB slate receiving 90% of bets vs the As ๐ฌ https://t.co/fXC5WuzhaC
- Sep 24, 20265.1x their median
Jordan Love is 12-21-1 ATS over the last three seasons, the worst ATS win rate among QBs with 20+ starts ๐ https://t.co/LAK5hMy98T
- Sep 8, 20265.1x their median
We have a tie ball game! For those keeping track at home SMU has: A fumble A missed field goal A pick in the end zone A muffed punt An offside on a made field goal for a first down that then led to a touchdown https://t.co/FmdtXULIxm
- Sep 8, 20265.1x their median
The Blue Jays (-210) were the largest and most bet favorite on todayโs MLB slate ๐ฌ https://t.co/kMjk1GKjph
- Sep 7, 20265.1x their median
The public is on SMU tonight ๐ 74% of bets have come in on the Mustangs, accounting for 84% of the money. ๐ฅ https://t.co/Si2ZW86iZX
- Sep 7, 20264.6x their median
โHey hon, got us pumpkin patch tickets for next Saturday from noon to 4:00 you donโt have anything going on, right?โ https://t.co/tSkouvGzqW
- Sep 7, 20264.1x their median
๐ SMU vs FSU CFB Week 1 Best Bet ๐ด SMU -2.5 ๐ Add Directly To Your Betslip https://t.co/6tdUUlW3F7 ๐ฃ๏ธ "SMU falls into a trend that has served investors well for a decade. Over the past 10 years, teams in Week 1 playing their first game of the season have covered the spread at a 58% clip against teams that played in Week 0. There are other areas where SMU has the advantage, first with Jennings and a collection of targets against a Florida State defense that allowed explosives to New Mexico State. Starting defensive backs Ashlynd Barker, Ja'Bril Rawls and CJ Richard Jr. all allowed a 20-yard explosive to the Aggies' passing game. With poor tackling, explosive plays allowed and minimal havoc, there is reason to believe SMU will create quality drives. The Mustangs should produce a much more aggressive pass rush than the Aggies, who get into double-digit pressures against Daniels." @Collin1
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 28 interactions against 260K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 75 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.239% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 75 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 387 interactions, about 14x its own typical post.
- What is Action Network's engagement rate on X?
- Action Network (@ActionNetworkHQ) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 75 original posts from the last 30 days against 259,897 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.011%, Action Network sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ActionNetworkHQ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @ActionNetworkHQ post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.93 posts per day across the measured window.