Absolute Chelsea engagement report
@AbsoluteChelsea - 842K followers on X
Measured over 145 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 462 interactions against 842K followers, an engagement rate of 0.055%. Measured over 145 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.73% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 145 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 67x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chelsea, #cfc, #chelseafc.
Measured over 145 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #chelsea, #cfc, #chelseafc.
Compared with accounts its own size
Absolute Chelsea's engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.055%, Absolute Chelsea sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.127% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 11% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 11% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 133 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 22, 202667x their median
We think you'll like this, Blues. 👀 https://t.co/IoOqSzGeWV
- Sep 6, 202618x their median
Ready for the Emirates... 🥶🔵 https://t.co/PupCSzWwVl
- Sep 6, 202610x their median
Reece James: "We'll see where we are at the end of the season. We know what we have to do and we have to focus on ourselves and not let other teams distract us." [via @SkySportsPL]
- Aug 30, 20268.1x their median
Xabi Alonso: “I'm not excited, I'm focused and thinking about the things that we have to do in the game…” [via @SkySportsPL]
- Aug 23, 20267.8x their median
Xabi Alonso on #Chelsea's first-choice goalkeeper: "The pitch is the boss of everything. I don't decide. The players need to show me." [via @kierangill_DM] https://t.co/Sjv6kUlBGO
- Aug 20, 20267.6x their median
Xabi Alonso on Marco Palestra: "He has this option [to play either side]. He has had a great impact in the changing room. He's a great guy. The freshness he has brought, it's a very great addition. [His profile is] something different, not that common here - but in Italy it is quite common."
- Aug 22, 20267.6x their median
Morgan Rogers: "It might not always go perfect, but with the right mentality, with the right mindset, we'll be where we deserve to be and where we need to be as a club and as a team..." [via @ChelseaFC]
- Aug 22, 20266.8x their median
Morgan Rogers: "The fans want to see their team perform to the level that they expect, and #Chelsea Football Club as a whole expect to compete with every team and be right at the top of the league. That's our aspiration and goal." [via @ChelseaFC] https://t.co/Q2ySxJNNZG
- Aug 30, 20266.5x their median
Xabi Alonso on Robert Sanchez: "We'll see. It was a decision we thought was good for the team, for the club. Sometimes you have to take tough decisions because this one is an important one. But now we need to look forward." [via @SkySportsPL]
- Aug 30, 20266.2x their median
Reece James: "We're aiming to cap off a good first week of the season with another win here today. Your support is going to be important as we look to make home advantage count again." [via #CFC / Programme]
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 462 interactions against 842K followers, an engagement rate of 0.055%. Measured over 145 original posts, its engagement rate beats 63% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 1.73% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 145 posts sampled, 11% carry an image or video and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 31K interactions, about 67x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #chelsea, #cfc, #chelseafc.
- What is Absolute Chelsea's engagement rate on X?
- Absolute Chelsea (@AbsoluteChelsea) has an engagement rate of 0.055%, based on the median interactions across 145 original posts from the last 30 days against 841,973 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.055%, Absolute Chelsea sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AbsoluteChelsea have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 63% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @AbsoluteChelsea post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.33 posts per day across the measured window.