Back to @AbdulHamidAhmad's profile

Abdul Hamid Ahmad engagement report

@AbdulHamidAhmad - 317K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 317K followers
Per impression
0.315%
794 views on a typical post
Reach
0.25%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 317K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 794 times each, and 0.315% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.251% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10 interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Abdul Hamid Ahmad's engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Abdul Hamid Ahmad sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,991 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,991 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 171 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 7, 20265.0x their median

    وجد صورتها بعد خمسين عاماً، فعاد في لحظة إلى الجامعة، إلى ضحكتها، وإلى حبٍ انتهى بالرحيل ولم ينتهِ في قلبه. قبّل الصورة ودفنها تحت المطر بين الزهور، لعلها تنبت وردة في زمن آخر. عالصورة امضيلي - بقلم عبد الحميد أحمد https://t.co/PkuCJItVKZ via @Story__Uae https://t.co/iJP0zgIPDo

    73001.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.5x their median

    سامي محمد الذي ترك «السدرة» في أحد شوارع دبي لم يكن مجرد نحات كويتي ناجح، وإنما كان واحداً من رواد الحركة التشكيلية الحديثة في الخليج، ومن جيل الفنانين الذين لم يجدوا أمامهم حركة فنية خليجية مكتملة، فشاركوا بأنفسهم في تأسيسها. https://t.co/2tI8D4dYKH

    63001.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20264.5x their median

    محمد بن راشد إلى محمد بن زايد: حين تكون الدولة أمانة لا إرثاً . كيف يتحول الإنجاز إلى مسؤولية، وكيف يصبح الإرث أمانة، ولماذا لا يكفي أن تحافظ الأجيال على ما ورثته، بل عليها أن تضيف إليه قبل أن تسلّمه لمن بعدها. https://t.co/1H4B0HUD2J

    72003.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.5x their median

    في دراسة أصدرها «مركز بيو للأبحاث»، في أبريل من العام الحالي، تبين أن الكتب الورقية لا تزال هي المفضلة لدى الأميركيين، وأن ثلث القراء فقط هم من قرأوا كتاباً إلكترونياً واحداً على الأقل خلال السنة الماضية. https://t.co/0WrPTPQpnq

    33014.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.5x their median

    الرهان على أن التحول الرقمي هو طوق النجاة المالي للصحف يثبت يوماً بعد يوم أنه مجرد «وهم كبير». فعائدات الإعلانات الرقمية شحيحة للغاية مقارنة بالورق، وتكاد تقتصر حصة الأسد منها على عمالقة التكنولوجيا https://t.co/nFlq0LPh05 via @AbdulHamidAhmad

    6001841 viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.5x their median

    Mohammed bin Rashid to Mohamed bin Zayed: When a nation is trust, not inheritance Preserving a nation does not mean preserving it in the form in which it once existed; it means preserving its capacity to evolve’ https://t.co/cHEh9aB3xl

    60101.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20263.0x their median

    I realise that my relationship with cinema did not begin with an interest in stars, directors . It began with wonder. It was the wonder of seeing people and places appear on a wall where, only moments earlier, there had been nothing but white paint. https://t.co/3RsadEDTbH

    50101.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.0x their median

    Scientists have identified a new wild cat species in Bolivia’s Yungas cloud forest—Leopardus tilcayo (Tilcayo)—the first newly described living cat species in over a century, raising fresh conservation concerns amid habitat loss https://t.co/9ELi1UEIPY

    4110753 viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.0x their median

    20 years after his death, the “story of absence” is not about absence alone. It tells us that some artists can return through their work, and that time, however far it takes us, cannot erase a genuine artistic legacy. https://t.co/e4awtYffsl

    51001.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.0x their median

    UAE is making progress in controlling phones inside schools, as 90.1% of the country’s students study in schools that do not allow their use, compared to 49.5% in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countries. https://t.co/D3OVJJgfuw

    6000975 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 317K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 794 times each, and 0.315% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.251% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10 interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.

What is Abdul Hamid Ahmad's engagement rate on X?
Abdul Hamid Ahmad (@AbdulHamidAhmad) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 316,809 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Abdul Hamid Ahmad sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,991 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AbdulHamidAhmad have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AbdulHamidAhmad post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going