Back to @AbbyJohnson's profile

Dr. Abby Johnson engagement report

@AbbyJohnson - 238K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.058%
of 238K followers
Per impression
2.59%
5.4K views on a typical post
Reach
2.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
139
interactions (median)
Saved
0.056%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 139 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.058%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 2.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 313x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr. Abby Johnson's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.058%, Dr. Abby Johnson sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,076 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,928 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video62% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link30% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 62% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 30% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 325 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 2022313x their median

    I aborted 2 of my children. I ran a Planned Parenthood clinic. Yet Jesus still forgave me, and changed me. If He can change me, He can change anyone.

    35K4.7K2.7K703View on X
  • Sep 9, 2026157x their median

    I had two abortions. I ran a Planned Parenthood clinic and even was named employee of the year. But Jesus met me in my brokenness, forgave me, and transformed my life. No one is beyond His mercy. If He can redeem my story, He can redeem anyone’s.

    20K1.8K31056158K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202632x their median

    “Women just don’t kill their children like that.” I keep hearing women say this while discussing the Lindsay Clancy case. But the rallying of support around a woman who strangled her children should not surprise us. For more than 50 years, our culture has insisted that women should have the right to end the lives of their own children…deliberately, legally, and with the full-throated defense of much of the public. So perhaps the shocking part isn’t that people can find a way to defend a mother who killed her children. Perhaps the shocking part is that we still pretend we haven’t spent decades teaching women that, under the right circumstances, killing your own child can be justified.

    3.7K531169601.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202615x their median

    Mothers are now filming themselves pretending to hurt their infants all for clicks. Last time I checked, babies aren’t props, child abuse isn’t content, and cruelty isn’t comedy. This is absolutely sickening.

    1.9K22140812K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202612x their median

    Timothy Ray Jones Jr. murdered his five children during a schizophrenic psychotic episode. After just two hours of deliberation, the jury sentenced him to death. Mental illness may explain an act, but it does not erase accountability.

    1.4K23012513K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20268.6x their median

    Gloria Steinem died. She had no biological children. She had at least one abortion. Her biological line ended. This is what will happen to liberalism. Aborted. https://t.co/MbfFEItjDS

    97713569919K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20268.5x their median

    There’s something so beautiful about Sunday Mass. No matter how chaotic the week has been, I get to kneel before Jesus, receive Him in the Eucharist, and remember what matters most. I’m so grateful to be Catholic 🤍

    1.1K641648.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20266.9x their median

    I had two abortions. I also spent 8 years inside the abortion industry. So when I say the law matters, I’m not speaking in theory. The law teaches. It restrains. It tells a culture what is worth protecting. Abortion being illegal would have stopped mine. And it would stop many others. If the child in the womb is a human being, then that child deserves equal protection under the law. Read my latest in @ChristianPost : https://t.co/yZG87nmklY

    79012829811K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20265.5x their median

    You can change the language. You can change the politics. You can call it “choice,” “healthcare,” or “reproductive freedom.” But you cannot change the truth: A human life has value before anyone else decides whether that life is wanted.

    6131292217.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20265.1x their median

    The brutality of what the governor endorsed and legalized cannot be understated. Full term babies are going to literally be ripped apart in the womb in the name of ‘healthcare’ and ‘choice’ and these women all proudly stood behind the governor with big smiles while she signed a death warrant.

    5121474477.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 139 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.058%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.4K times each, and 2.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 62% carry an image or video and 30% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 313x its own typical post.

What is Dr. Abby Johnson's engagement rate on X?
Dr. Abby Johnson (@AbbyJohnson) has an engagement rate of 0.058%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 237,698 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.058%, Dr. Abby Johnson sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AbbyJohnson have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AbbyJohnson post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going