Back to @AaronKheriatyMD's profile

Aaron Kheriaty engagement report

@AaronKheriatyMD - 353K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 353K followers
Per impression
0.704%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
4.83%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
120
interactions (median)
Saved
0.085%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.57/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 353K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.704% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.2K interactions, about 60x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Aaron Kheriaty's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 38% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, Aaron Kheriaty sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99118.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,691 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,485 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile118.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 390 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202660x their median

    Colin Farrell’s son James has Angelman syndrome. James is nonverbal and needs ongoing care. When he started aging out of the programs meant for kids, his dad saw what happens next a lot of families get left with less support just when the need doesn’t go away. So Farrell launched a foundation to help adults with intellectual disabilities and the people who care for them. He said he wants the world to treat James with kindness and respect. That’s the bar. The rest is trying to make sure other families aren’t on their own when the childhood services stop.

    6.7K4573911235K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202619x their median

    Cal Berkeley is cooked: I teach calculus at Berkeley. Some of my students can’t do middle school math “Since the University of California abandoned the SAT and ACT, thousands of faculty say it’s admitting students who aren’t prepared for the coursework.” “I teach mathematics at UC Berkeley. Three days a week, I stand in front of lecture halls with 500 to 1,400 students. By the second week of the semester, I already know who is in trouble. Some students are five to eight years behind in mathematics.”

    1.7K37015065232K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20268.7x their median

    My piece in the @nypost, co-authored with @ADM_Christine, on our new report from HHS, “Wolves in White Coats: How Doctors and Hospitals Pushed and Profited from the Fraud of ‘Gender Medicine’.” https://t.co/jkzVD4pqYP

    781205332097K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20253.7x their median

    My new book launches today: MAKING THE CUT: HOW TO HEAL MODERN MEDICINE. Order Here: https://t.co/YA7ckT9yRz "“In the tradition of such medical chronicles as Intern and House of God, Dr. Kheriaty records his progression from medical student to a full-fledged attending physician by reflecting on the patients he cared for, and who taught him in turn. This outsider, not-quite-orthodox medical student evolves into a questioning physician—and questions abound. Both affectionate critique and pointed criticism from a self-professed reluctant romantic in love with flawed patients and his flawed profession, he looks at his profession as he would a patient and determines that it is sick indeed. This book is his prescription for a cure.” —G. Kevin Donovan, MD, MA, Clinical Professor Emeritus and Director of the Center for Clinical Bioethics at Georgetown University

    3248925275K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    “Spain is one of the safest countries in the world.” “Is it thanks to surveillance?” “No.” “The UK has much more surveillance.” “Is it a safer country?” “No.” Carissa Véliz just slammed the argument that surveillance leads to safety. And she called the rise of surveillance technology a “symptom of authoritarianism.” “Let’s suppose that we do have more data, and we can better track people, and better… predict people’s behavior.” “Is that a good thing?” “If you want an authoritarian regime, that’s a great thing.” “If you want a liberal democracy that is healthy, in which people feel… freedom to protest anonymously and peacefully, then no, that’s not a good thing at all.” @CarissaVeliz

    100366419K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    The new report (and accompanying mini-documentary) won't spell the end for the hundreds of pediatric gender operations in the US, but it could be the beginning of the end. "Wolves in White Coats: HHS Exposes the Racket Behind ‘Gender-Affirming Care’" (article below). https://t.co/q6UDzdturE

    68185315K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Every health care interaction paid for by insurance or the government is recorded and obtainable through several databases - an all claims database. It's anonymous and legal. This information is critical to researching healthcare outcomes, prevalence of diseases, spending, and all aspects of our healthcare system. TRAs now routinely claim that reporting sex rejecting procedures in the same way will result in a "list" the government will use to round them up. Their delusions are not a legal defense against a prosecution for violating the federal False Claims Act.

    72134111K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Young popes. These are all terrific but Leo’s Blues Brothers photo is the best. https://t.co/FIqaBb4DOW

    272506.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    Congratulations to @ClareMorellEPPC who was awarded the Surgeon General's Medallion for her work exposing the harms of screen use on children! https://t.co/75GalBa3IM

    113022.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 120 interactions against 353K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.704% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.83% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.2K interactions, about 60x its own typical post.

What is Aaron Kheriaty's engagement rate on X?
Aaron Kheriaty (@AaronKheriatyMD) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 353,028 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, Aaron Kheriaty sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,691 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AaronKheriatyMD have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AaronKheriatyMD post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going