Back to @ASKA_Pop_ASKA's profile

ASKA engagement report

@ASKA_Pop_ASKA - 201K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.355%
of 201K followers
Per impression
1.52%
47K views on a typical post
Reach
23.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
712
interactions (median)
Saved
0.041%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.53/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 712 interactions against 201K followers, an engagement rate of 0.355%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 1.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 27x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ulas, #aska, #askaロックオン.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026. Recurring tags: #ulas, #aska, #askaロックオン.

Compared with accounts its own size

ASKA's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 55% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.355%, ASKA sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video36% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link56% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 56% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 157 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 202627x their median

    東京都のみなさん、今すぐにゴミ袋へ水を溜めて「玄関、トイレ、洗面台、お風呂場、洗濯機の排水路」に置いてください。もし被災しても汚水の逆流を防げるので片付けが変わります(過去に被災したものより) #線状降水帯 #大雨 https://t.co/VPRHSFZNF3

    15K4.1K892693.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202620x their median

    ウクライナ(軍)には支援しない。 しかし、「ウクライナ人には義援金を送りたい」という日本人の気持ちは無になった。 義援金はどこにも記録されてなかった。 https://t.co/Q7C2RMqAP5

    10K3.7K157104155K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202616x their median

    Çocuğa karma aşı vurulmadan 4 gün önceki ve aşıdan 4 gün sonraki videosu. Tüm insanlık ve insan nesli şeytani bir saldırı altında. https://t.co/lHytIyzjG4

    8.3K3.0K2792021.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202615x their median

    🚨El desgarrador momento en el que el profesor Ian Brighthope rompe a llorar frente a miles de personas en Perth cuando se da cuenta de que se han administrado 60 millones de vacunas mortales a personas inocentes, lo que ahora causa muerte y cáncer. https://t.co/CMeX6uCBRh

    6.7K3.6K81109603K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202611x their median

    麻布で髪を切ってきた。 2年前だったかな。 そこで身体の大きな外国人と会った。 その人は、がんのステージ3だった。 と。 すぐにイベルメクチンを教えたよ。 飲み方も教えた。 いま、報告があった。 「すっかり治って『オレは不死身なんだ!』って言ってました」🤭 あはは。治ればいいです✌️

    6.8K7756520302K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20269.3x their median

    HOSPITAL MURDER PROTOCOL: Remdesivir, NOT COVID, was the real killer! Dr. Bryan Ardis: "Hospitals were ordered to give every “COVID” patient this experimental poison — Remdesivir — and EVERYONE died on the 10-day treatment protocol." Fauci KNEW it was deadly. In the 2019 Ebola trial HE funded, it had a 53% kill rate. The safety board shut it down immediately: "Too toxic. Too deadly. We’re not using it anymore." Yet Fauci lied to Congress, lied to America, and made it the ONLY approved treatment — paired with ventilators that finished the job. They called it “standard of care.” We call it mass murder for profit. Millions dead. Hospitals paid to kill. Fauci & NIH guilty as sin. This wasn’t a pandemic... it was a Remdesivir massacre.

    3.9K2.4K17012783K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20264.4x their median

    会話してるとラーメンがテーブルに来るじゃん。 「美味しそうだ」と、心の声がするじゃん。  お箸を割るじゃん。 かき混ぜるじゃん。 ここでいつも気がつく。 あ、写真、、、。 https://t.co/q9z4iThIU4

    2.9K1141052465K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20263.7x their median

    I never thought I'd be writing this. My dad is 68. Used to farm. Now he's fighting colon cancer. Five weeks ago, I put him on a protocol I put together from what I learned here on X: • 72mg Ivermectin (daily) • 444mg Fenbendazole • 4,000mg Vitamin C • 32oz Hibiscus tea Also fasting, sun, low‑inflammatory food. Yesterday, his new CT scan came back. Tumor shrinkage. But here's the part that really got me. Dad also had this ugly spot on his neck. Basal cell. Been there for years. Growing. So I did something else. I took the same Ivermectin paste – the one from the farm store – and dabbed it on that spot. Three times a day. One month later? The spot is gone. Completely cleared. He called me this morning. His voice was different. "It's gone, son." And me? I've been taking a smaller dose myself – 24mg Ivermectin + 444mg Fenbendazole – just to see what happens. My sleep fixed itself. I wake up without an alarm. I don't crave sugar anymore. I don't even want to over‑eat. I feel… calm. Look, I know how this sounds. Horse paste for cancer? For skin cancer? I laughed too. Then I watched my dad's scans change. I'm not a doctor. I'm just a son who refused to give up. Healing is always possible. Even when it looks crazy.

    2.0K578531987K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20263.4x their median

    スピルバーグ 監督「#ディスクロージャー・デイ(情報開示の日)」を観てきた。 理解するのが困難な人もいるだろうね。 そのような人は「SF映画」と割り切って楽しんでください。 いろんなことを知ってる人は、答え合わせを。 https://t.co/qvjudbuT4g

    2.2K221331685K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.0x their median

    健康って、口腔内ケアなんだよね。 認知症のほとんどの原因も口内雑菌だった。 ---- 高齢者の死亡リスク、舌ブラシ使用で23%低下、歯間清掃で11%低下 約1万人を6年間追跡 東京科学大学 | スポーツ栄養Web【一般社団法人日本スポーツ栄養協会(SNDJ)公式情報サイト】 https://t.co/YF2RspVbyF #スポーツ栄養

    1.8K28334849K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ulas#aska#askaロックオン#onyourmark#週刊現代

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 712 interactions against 201K followers, an engagement rate of 0.355%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 1.52% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 23.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 16% are part of a thread and 56% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20K interactions, about 27x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ulas, #aska, #askaロックオン.

What is ASKA's engagement rate on X?
ASKA (@ASKA_Pop_ASKA) has an engagement rate of 0.355%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 201,130 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.355%, ASKA sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ASKA_Pop_ASKA have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ASKA_Pop_ASKA post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going