American Psychological Association engagement report
@APA - 291K followers on X
Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 34 interactions against 291K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.4K times each, and 1.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 134 interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #apa2026, #edtech.
Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026. Recurring tags: #apa2026, #edtech.
Compared with accounts its own size
American Psychological Association's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.012%, American Psychological Association sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 96% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 96% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 281 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 24, 20263.9x their median
Why do two people watch the same video, read the same headline, or witness the same event and walk away with completely different conclusions? The answer isn’t stubbornness or bad faith. It’s the science of perception. Learn more: https://t.co/GvO1XPc7xi https://t.co/4d9tPmfilz
- Sep 1, 20263.1x their median
💜 September is Suicide Prevention Awareness Month. If you’re concerned about a loved one, take action. If you or someone you know is in crisis, call or text 988 to reach the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, available 24/7. Learn more: https://t.co/35WdfByjFX https://t.co/85Z6cyHQ3f
- Sep 14, 20263.0x their median
Self‑injury and suicidal thoughts don’t appear as “messy clothes” or “moodiness.” They show up in what students say and what they hide. Listen as Dr. Matthew Nock explains the real red flags that teachers and administrators need to know. Learn more: https://t.co/YfE3XlujUW https://t.co/pMKvHs4cXD
- Sep 18, 20262.9x their median
Children and teenagers are turning to AI for friendship, advice, and support. Psychologists say this raises important questions about what happens to social and emotional development when AI fills roles that used to belong to other people. Learn more: https://t.co/LgfZj6e5Sx https://t.co/AKDRbbCqeK
- Sep 5, 20262.8x their median
TMS is reshaping treatment for depression and OCD, while researchers explore its potential for PTSD, Alzheimer’s disease, autism and more. As neuroscience focuses more on brain circuits, TMS may offer targeted, personalized care. Learn more: https://t.co/nx5a0Jo1Ex https://t.co/lS1QeVQAj0
- Aug 23, 20262.5x their median
Many mental disorders may share common genetic foundations, helping explain why conditions often co-occur. Read more highlights from recent peer-reviewed studies: https://t.co/0W7lucswIF https://t.co/aIMVIDo8gM
- Aug 18, 20262.5x their median
Feeling overwhelmed? Research shows just 10 minutes of petting a dog or cat can meaningfully reduce cortisol, your body’s primary stress hormone. Learn more about the science of animals and well-being: https://t.co/XamfbP5Qwk https://t.co/XEjpO2xPlR
- Sep 9, 20262.4x their median
Not all educational technology is created equal. APA’s new report gives educators, families, policymakers and developers 10 evidence-based recommendations for EdTech that protects how children and adolescents learn and develop. Read the full report: https://t.co/Czx1nEmn06 https://t.co/WJtretp2gV
- Aug 31, 20262.2x their median
Research from APA’s Journal of Educational Psychology shows teachers’ joy sparks better learning, while anger shuts students down. Findings highlight the importance of supporting teacher well-being as part of improving education systems. Learn more: https://t.co/RD2PeLZB5L https://t.co/Wu9kf7xvpS
- Aug 26, 20262.1x their median
Research shows that when children read aloud to dogs, their scores improve and their love of reading grows, especially for kids who struggle or are learning English as a second language. Learn more: https://t.co/XamfbP5Qwk https://t.co/pq2FnkbsSY
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 34 interactions against 291K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.4K times each, and 1.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 134 interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #apa2026, #edtech.
- What is American Psychological Association's engagement rate on X?
- American Psychological Association (@APA) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 57 original posts from the last 30 days against 291,474 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.012%, American Psychological Association sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @APA have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @APA post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.