Back to @ANNELAMOTT's profile

ANNE LAMOTT engagement report

@ANNELAMOTT - 225K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.195%
of 225K followers
Per impression
1.17%
37K views on a typical post
Reach
16.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
438
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
22 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.07/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 438 interactions against 225K followers, an engagement rate of 0.195%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 1.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ANNE LAMOTT's engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.195%, ANNE LAMOTT sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video36% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link36% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 36% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 179 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 29, 202623x their median

    The look of horror on Katie Britt's face as Eric Schmitt humiliates himself at the Jack Smith hearing is incredible. https://t.co/kwYivIQp3T

    9.1K90318369200K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202616x their median

    Read non-fiction. Read fiction. Read science fiction. Read historical fiction. Read fan fiction. Read romance. Read thriller. Read horror. Read comic. Read comedy. Read drama. Read economics. Read geography. Read politics. Read this. Read that. Read any book. The goal is: READ. https://t.co/ga7G4nDlv6

    5.4K1.4K525986K viewsView on X
  • May 11, 20267.2x their median

    During what should be a quick nail trim, one groundhog seems to have already accepted its fate... while the other panics with every snip https://t.co/MbOV5ZiMtv

    2.7K3245527168K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20265.7x their median

    I don’t know what’s ahead regarding the allegations that led to the arrests of Seth & Heather Day. They have the right in this country to be heard by a jury and tried in court. But I know this: There’s one fiercely brave girl who defied the odds, broke the family code, marched her bruised body forward and TOLD. God bless that child, heal that child, restore that child and raise that child into one astonishingly mighty woman of faith.

    2.3K81657161K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20244.6x their median

    How I look at the flight attendant during snack time so they know I’m awake and would like a cookie https://t.co/62dIMgUCzP

    1.8K15521482K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20263.9x their median

    Air Force One flys over Neyland Stadium https://t.co/XrZErnRBqQ

    1.5K148331558K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20263.3x their median

    "I have the highest IQ. I have the highest." -- Donald J. Trump The man is a walking, talking illustration of the Dunning-Kruger effect. He is also -- if he believes even a small fraction of what he told Time -- completely out of his mind. https://t.co/t6Nqa6A7lw

    1.2K258241628K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.0x their median

    If you’re mad at Republicans over gas prices, the answer isn’t to vote for the Democrats. https://t.co/VaJF3PqH2a

    3696477688260K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    Hegseth: "We need bolts of lightning. High-end kill chains capable of striking unexpectedly and decisively" https://t.co/338k3GzHIz

    2515622248145K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026

    The goodness of working together toward the common good is the most powerful force on Earth. And that goodness leads to hope.

    26630305.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 438 interactions against 225K followers, an engagement rate of 0.195%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 71% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 37K times each, and 1.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 16.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

What is ANNE LAMOTT's engagement rate on X?
ANNE LAMOTT (@ANNELAMOTT) has an engagement rate of 0.195%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 224,515 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.195%, ANNE LAMOTT sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ANNELAMOTT have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 71% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ANNELAMOTT post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going