PlayerSells
Back to @ANGELAWHITE's profile

ANGELA WHITE engagement report

@ANGELAWHITE - 3.6M followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.203%
of 3.6M followers
Per impression
2.43%
301K views on a typical post
Reach
8.34%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.437%
1.3K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.17/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 7.3K interactions against 3.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.203%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 301K times each, and 2.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 5.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ANGELA WHITE's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.203%, ANGELA WHITE sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.047% to 0.325%.

p100.001%
p250.007%
p50 (median)0.047%
p750.325%
p902.60%
p99357.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,981 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 447,404 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.007%
50th percentile0.047%
75th percentile0.325%
90th percentile2.60%
99th percentile357.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%15K
01:00 UTC+4%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-5%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%17K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%29K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%30K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%24K
20:00 UTC0%22K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%17K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 96%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+8%59K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%94K
Wednesday-4%78K
Thursday-3%71K
Friday-5%73K
Saturday+2%64K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+79%+73% to +85%5.8K
Outbound link28% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.1K
Typical length--7%-8% to -5%9.0K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 28% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 107 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 7% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 11, 20265.7x their median

    rip to the greatest yaoi the world cup has ever seen https://t.co/8QF5LoneqO

    37K4.6K53320854K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20264.9x their median

    Find out how an innocent GG scene with @sophiedee turned into us sharing @MrLuckyPOV's hard cock ๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ‘€ XXX Vlog and BTS out NOW ๐Ÿ˜ˆโคต๏ธ https://t.co/8N1n3B7QEx

    33K2.4K1479601K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20264.3x their median

    I asked @MrLuckyPOV to film my girl/girl collab with @sophiedee... but the shoot took an unexpected turn when Sophie caught me sucking his dick ๐Ÿ˜œ๐Ÿ˜ˆ

    29K2.1K213121.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20263.8x their median

    Me + @angelawhite โ€ฆ. how long would u last? ๐Ÿ˜… https://t.co/Usi8bzX6Ee

    26K1.6K5220452K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20263.5x their median

    Sheeeesh ๐Ÿฅต๐Ÿ”ฅ My chemistry with @princessemilyle is insane! ๐Ÿ’ฅ Watch our hot threesome with @FlightLifeMars3 ๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿ‘€ I don't even know how he lasted through that booty bouncing ๐Ÿ˜œโคต๏ธ https://t.co/ksEd5B67hc

    23K1.8K11211887K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.4x their median

    My collab with @sophiedee took an unexpected turn when she caught me sucking the cameraman's dick ๐Ÿ˜ˆ๐Ÿ† https://t.co/rAvVrrOrAv

    16K9841596544K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20262.1x their median

    He broke the law. I broke the rules ๐Ÿš”๐Ÿ˜œ Had way too much fun arresting @oxcensored for @Brazzers ๐Ÿ˜ˆโคต๏ธ https://t.co/VL4QlPO24N https://t.co/063Hfuj8xB

    14K9661474825K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 20262.0x their median

    Is this your dream? โœจโ˜๏ธ https://t.co/ek1IIKUGWB

    14K80228013575K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.9x their median

    Guess what I'm about to do with @sophiedee ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ˜ˆ https://t.co/RCmGtY3ts5

    13K65222612680K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261.9x their median

    Don't miss my LIVE show tomorrow night! ๐Ÿ’– Cum with me at 6pm PST โžก๏ธ https://t.co/kn3AqZcLX0 https://t.co/hLPBv7duJ1

    13K7191065583K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7.3K interactions against 3.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0.203%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 1,003 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 301K times each, and 2.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 42K interactions, about 5.7x its own typical post.

What is ANGELA WHITE's engagement rate on X?
ANGELA WHITE (@ANGELAWHITE) has an engagement rate of 0.203%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,613,839 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.203%, ANGELA WHITE sits above the 50th percentile of the 9,981 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ANGELAWHITE have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,003 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ANGELAWHITE post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going