Back to @ANAALThani's profile

Abdullah N Al Thani engagement report

@ANAALThani - 141K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.006%
of 141K followers
Per impression
0.49%
1.8K views on a typical post
Reach
1.30%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
9
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 141K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 162 interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #justiceformalaga.

Compared with accounts its own size

Abdullah N Al Thani's engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Abdullah N Al Thani sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 210 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 8, 202418x their median

    Everyone know what happened against Málaga cf This is bands game we ask to open international investigation Fair and transparent we ask for justice Respect @MalagaCF The Black day of football in the world #The_Black_day 9-4-2013 🌑 After that they are start against me and all my family @rfef @laliga @Tebasjavier @LaLigaEN @LaLigaArab @LaLigaFRA @LaLigaJP @UEFAcom @UEFA @ChampionsLeague @EuropaLeague @FIFAcom @FIFAWorldCup @fifaworldcup_es @fifaworldcup_fr @fifaworldcup_ar #Málagacf #Málaga #España #Spain We asking for our right

    66984382K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.3x their median

    They set the standard. They sharpened it for everyone else. Then the measure changed hands and for the first time its edge faced those who had defined it. #JusticeForMalaga

    111455.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20261.7x their median

    At first, everyone was useful. Later, everyone became necessary. Then necessity became liability and every alliance acquired a private reason to survive without the others. #JusticeForMalaga

    61802.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20261.6x their median

    Everything had a place. Almost. One space remained too precise to be accidental. When the rest finally aligned the empty place stopped looking empty and started describing what belonged there. #JusticeForMalaga

    221003.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    They admired how high the ceiling stood. They never looked at what carried its weight. Then one support shifted and every protected corner discovered it had been standing beneath the same burden. #JusticeForMalaga

    31802.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    They defended the thought as if it were their own. They gave it their voices, their faces, their conviction. Until one question reached the root and suddenly everyone had to remember who had planted it. #JusticeForMalaga

    22702.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Each thought he knew what he had given. Each assumed he knew what he would receive. Then the exchange revealed its true terms and every one of them discovered something had been taken that was never part of the bargain. #JusticeForMalaga

    52402.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026

    The reason sounded convincing because each received the one meant for him. They never compared why they had agreed. Until the reasons met and every explanation discovered it had been protecting a different purpose. #JusticeForMalaga

    22512.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026

    They accepted the reward as proof they had mattered. They never asked what the reward remembered. Then every privilege acquired a history and what once felt like payment began pointing back to the reason it was given. #JusticeForMalaga

    42402.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    The instructions sounded simple when everyone had a role. Each carried away only what was meant for him. Years later, the fragments met and every partial instruction began exposing what another had never been told. #JusticeForMalaga

    42401.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#justiceformalaga

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 141K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 16% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.8K times each, and 0.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 100% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 162 interactions, about 18x its own typical post.

What is Abdullah N Al Thani's engagement rate on X?
Abdullah N Al Thani (@ANAALThani) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 141,254 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Abdullah N Al Thani sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ANAALThani have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 16% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ANAALThani post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going