Back to @AKinkhabwala's profile

Aditi Kinkhabwala engagement report

@AKinkhabwala - 245K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 245K followers
Per impression
0.362%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
6.79%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
60
interactions (median)
Saved
0.015%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.9/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 245K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.362% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.0K interactions, about 83x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #jets, #ravens, #saints.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #jets, #ravens, #saints.

Compared with accounts its own size

Aditi Kinkhabwala's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 21% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, Aditi Kinkhabwala sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,665 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,665 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,911 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video58% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 271 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 30, 202683x their median

    Chop wood carry water https://t.co/YWHHM0RwA4

    4.3K4441151542.5M viewsView on X
  • Apr 26, 202654x their median

    NFL Draft attendance since 2015: 2015, Chicago: 200,000 2016, Chicago: 225,000 2017, Philadelphia: 250,000 2018, Dallas: 200,000 2019, Nashville: 600,000 2020: Virtual 2021, Cleveland: 160,000 2022, Las Vegas: 300,000 2023, Kansas City: 312,000 2024, Detroit: 775,000 2025, Green Bay: 600,000 2026, Pittsburgh: 805,000

    2.7K33896751.1M viewsView on X
  • Jan 28, 202634x their median

    #Browns DC Jim Schwartz was upset at being passed over for HC and told coaches he doesn’t plan on staying in Cleveland, sources tell The Insiders. Schwartz is under contract and the team wants him but it’s a situation that at the very least needs to be worked through. https://t.co/wdHYELSYkK

    1.8K216200309941K viewsView on X
  • Feb 11, 202625x their median

    Seattle public schools to stay open and deny excused absences during the #Seahawks victory parade… guaranteeing babysitters for hundreds of thousands of parents to enjoy the party. Our story: https://t.co/YNhRs8uZLt https://t.co/YNhRs8uZLt

    1.4K73247160827K viewsView on X
  • Mar 23, 202623x their median

    Can’t take the journalist out of Kevin Harlan. Even as the emcee of his father’s celebration of life at Lambeau Field, he had to ask Mike McCarthy about a possible reunion with Aaron Rodgers in Pittsburgh: https://t.co/kIKOShXgHf

    1.6K882510664K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202625x their median

    Asked to sit w/ the #Giants’ three pass rushers. When team PR told Brian Burns, he insisted rookie LB Arvell Reese join the group. I asked Burns, the All-Pro, why? He said, “Because he’s *going* to be one of us.” (Can’t wait for you to see this on @nfloncbs. They were gold!) https://t.co/fFg1UGjSMj

    1.4K742225168K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202617x their median

    Jared Verse was still on the field signing autographs 45 minutes after Browns practice ended.

    952471315237K viewsView on X
  • Jan 26, 202613x their median

    Major credit and props to Zak Kuhr for installing and calling this #Patriots D. But Mike Vrabel will not ignore the man he originally goaded to come join him and run his defense; Terrell Williams is fighting cancer and Vrabel is reminding everyone to think of him #TStrong https://t.co/nRqoS0Aqhj

    9704011152K viewsView on X
  • Apr 23, 202615x their median

    Scenes from the #NFLDraft here in #Pittsburgh. (AFC North, never change.) https://t.co/rHctfecqCa

    76848481976K viewsView on X
  • Mar 9, 20268.7x their median

    #Steelers fans, in addition to a consistently productive WR who can run the entire route tree, you’re also getting a tremendous leader and tone-setter in Michael Pittman. Two years ago, he spent nearly six figures on equipment and three days a week -every week- outside #Colts HQ just to make himself available to play. Told me then “my teammates deserve my best even when I’m not at my best.”

    5974915359K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#jets#ravens#saints#titans#afcnorth

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 60 interactions against 245K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.362% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.9 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.0K interactions, about 83x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #jets, #ravens, #saints.

What is Aditi Kinkhabwala's engagement rate on X?
Aditi Kinkhabwala (@AKinkhabwala) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 245,431 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, Aditi Kinkhabwala sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,665 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AKinkhabwala have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AKinkhabwala post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going