Back to @AIwithSajid's profile

Sajid AI engagement report

@AIwithSajid - 196K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.036%
of 196K followers
Per impression
0.083%
85K views on a typical post
Reach
43.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
71
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
21 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 71 interactions against 196K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 85K times each, and 0.083% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 43.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 424 interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sajid AI's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 5% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.036%, Sajid AI sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.127%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,282 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,969 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 403 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 20266.0x their median

    POV: She Saved the Milkshake Before the Plot ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿฅค Made with ChatGPT ๐Ÿค–โœจ Prompts Create a photorealistic 10-second vertical 9:16 cinematic video. A stylish young woman calmly drinks a milkshake at the counter of a 1950s American diner. A male waiter carrying a burger and orange juice accidentally collides with a man, sending the tray, burger and juice flying. Time freezes in dramatic bullet-time as orange juice droplets hang in the air and the camera makes a fast smooth 360ยฐ orbit. Everyone freezes except the woman, who casually takes another sip. Time instantly rewinds, everything returns to normal, and the woman gives the waiter a knowing smile. End with a close-up of her taking one final sip. Photorealistic, cinematic lighting, realistic physics, smooth camera movement, anamorphic lens, shallow depth of field, film grain, premium movie quality, consistent characters, no text, no subtitles.

    288924042.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    Claude AI + YouTube is a powerful combination. From turning a simple idea into a script to planning the title and thumbnail, AI can make the content creation process much faster. The future of YouTube creation is getting smarter. https://t.co/pYyCR3fEoF

    4018282190K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    ๐Ÿšจ BREAKING: ChatGPT โ€œStealth Writingโ€ Trick Going Viral? People are sharing claims about a hidden writing technique that supposedly makes AI-generated text feel much more natural. It allegedly helps: โ†’ Reduce repetitive AI phrasing โ†’ Make writing sound more personal โ†’ Improve sentence flow โ†’ Give content a more human editorial feel And now several prompts are being shared as the โ€œsecret formulaโ€ ๐Ÿ‘‡

    3826221102K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    1987 โ†’ 2026 In 1987, computers were the future. ๐Ÿ’ป In 2026, AI is becoming the new normal. ๐Ÿค– The biggest difference? Back then, you learned how to use computers. Today, you can tell AI what you want โ€” and it can help build it. Weโ€™re still early. ๐Ÿš€ https://t.co/MkaGi3w56E

    331922185K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    ๐ŸŽฌ "Your AI Expert Is Here โ€” Let's Build Together | Aiwithjames" Alternates: "I Build AI Projects โ€” Do You Have an Idea? |@AIwithJames" "Meet Your AI Expert |@AIwithJames" "From Idea to AI Reality โ€” With @AIwithJames" "Let's Turn Your Idea Into an AI Project" "AI Expert. Real Projects. Real Results. | @AIwithJames "

    26202503.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    ๐Ÿš€ Need an AI Video or Promotion for your Business? ๐ŸŽฌ I create professional AI videos for: โœ… Websites & Companies โœ… Brands & Products โœ… X/Twitter Ads โœ… Social Media Promotion โœ… Promotional & Marketing Videos ๐Ÿ“ข Want to promote your business on X/Twitter? I can promote it to my 196K+ followers on X! ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ”ฅ ๐Ÿ’ก AI video + X promotion = Get your brand in front of a bigger audience! ๐Ÿ“ฒ WhatsApp: +92 342 9479788 ๐Ÿ“ง Email: [email protected] ๐Ÿ“ฉ Contact me and letโ€™s grow your brand! #AI #AIVideo #XTwitter #XAds #Promotion #DigitalMarketing #Business

    24181904.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026

    A farmer found a pot of gold. Every morning, it gave him one gold coin. At first, he was grateful. Then greed took over. He wanted everything at once โ€” and lost it all. Sometimes, patience is worth more than gold. https://t.co/lyldXPKsfS

    291661149K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    AI commercials are getting seriously cinematic. The workflow is simple: A strong 3D concept โ†’ AI-generated footage โ†’ smart editing โ†’ final polish. The AI creates most of the visual possibilities. The editor decides which moments actually make the cut. https://t.co/FaLxnbcgVv

    1816604.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    ๐Ÿ’ธ Start Making $500โ€“$1,000/Day Using AI Tools ๐Ÿš€ No coding skills โŒ No investment โŒ No complicated setup โŒ I created a simple, step-by-step blueprint that anyone can follow from zero. โœ… Beginner-friendly โœ… Best AI tools included โœ… From beginner to advanced โœ… Free for a limited time ๐ŸŽ Want it? ๐Ÿ‘ Like this post ๐Ÿ”” Subscribe fast โ™ป๏ธ Repost ๐Ÿ’ฌ Comment "AI" I'll send it directly to your DM ๐Ÿ“ฉ

    6240933 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 71 interactions against 196K followers, an engagement rate of 0.036%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 85K times each, and 0.083% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 43.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 424 interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post.

What is Sajid AI's engagement rate on X?
Sajid AI (@AIwithSajid) has an engagement rate of 0.036%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 196,479 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.036%, Sajid AI sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,282 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AIwithSajid have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AIwithSajid post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going