Back to @AIwithGhotai's profile

Kalsoom (ghotai ) engagement report

@AIwithGhotai - 51K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.425%
of 51K followers
Per impression
0.302%
72K views on a typical post
Reach
140.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
217
interactions (median)
Saved
0.072%
52 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.8/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 217 interactions against 51K followers, an engagement rate of 0.425%. Posts are seen about 72K times each, and 0.302% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 140.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 265 interactions. Recurring topics include #aicreator, #aifilmmaking, #capcutpc. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026. Recurring tags: #aicreator, #aifilmmaking, #capcutpc.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.425%, Kalsoom (ghotai ) sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,004 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,390 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video86% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link71% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 86% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 71% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 539 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 25, 2026

    I stopped doing my weekly competitor research manually. I gave Qoder one recurring task: → Track Cursor, Windsurf & GitHub Copilot → Check official updates, X, Reddit & Product Hunt → Find the week’s important releases, news & partnerships → Turn it all into a structured report and save it automatically The best part? I set the workflow once. Qoder handles the research → analysis → report. That’s the kind of AI workflow I actually want to automate. Qwen 3.8 Flash is currently at 0.0x Credits through September 30. Enter my code 9797YB at https://t.co/KKO98jZSR7 first, then download Qoder and sign in. You will get 600 Credits: 300 from the trial and 300 from my code.

    20925310119K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    Deel just shared something pretty wild: $140M+ in ARR added in 90 days without increasing headcount. Behind it: 8,000+ AI agents doing the work of ~600 employees. Akai was built internally to automate Finance, HR, AP, Compliance and other repetitive operations. 600 employees’ worth of monthly hours automated by AI agents Akai was an internal tool built at Deel ($17.3B valuation) to automate back-office operations. You record your screen while doing a task. It watches how you work, learns the workflow and edge cases, then runs it for you. → Works across your existing tools, even legacy systems with no APIs → Workflows can be changed in plain English → Teams can share and improve workflows → Agents keep learning as more cases are handled The results Deel shared: → 85% of payment reconciliation automated → 500+ hours/week of manual work eliminated → Revenue per employee: $130K → $215K Deel's putting a 1,000-hour Automation Guarantee behind it. If you're a 100-person company and they can’t automate 1,000+ hours in 30 days, you get a full refund. If this fits your description, I'd book a Demo ASAP: https://t.co/aPYYoI3FHi $5000 free Akai credits btw.

    2012735284K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 2026

    $0.003 per second for video generation, without compromising on speed or visual quality? The supplied comparisons put Vivix W1 alongside leading models on visual quality. It also delivers eight seconds of video in roughly eight seconds. But the bigger story is that W1 is a real-time interactive video model. Every extra minute of interaction means more video to generate and pay for. Making generation this affordable could make interactive stories and live visuals practical to run, not just impressive demos. Live visuals are what I’m most curious about. Generating quickly is one thing; reacting at the right moment is what would make them feel live. @VivixLabs_HQ already offers real-time generation through the API; the browser playground currently produces finished clips. A closer look at what could power those live visuals 👇 https://t.co/qGL4LZ628H

    1922530072K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026

    🚨 Breaking! Dreamina is offering a $1.5/month promotion and there’s a smarter way to get 4K AI videos without wasting credits. Generate in 480p, reroll until you get the perfect shot, then upscale ONLY your favorite clip to 4K. Try it here 👇 🔗 https://t.co/A3R4I2BVve #Dreamina #DreaminaPartner #AIvideo

    1642824141K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    The era of the one-person studio for AI short dramas has arrived. @OnSoloAI has helped me integrate all the tools, making it beginner-friendly. It covers scriptwriting, asset generation, and video rendering all in one click. Now I'm a real director. This is a fantastic tool. I can produce an episode of a short drama in just half an hour, simply by giving Onsolo a single sentence!

    1552426067K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 2026

    Your next edit just got cheaper. Save 60% on Pro or 40% on Ultra, Oct 20–30. CapCut Desktop only. I tested a Codex + CapCut PC AI video editing workflow using the Jean Phil trend. #capcutpc https://t.co/PxbtiywNlR

    1642018053K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    One detail about Pexo's Mark to Fix deserves more attention: the frames around the one you marked. You select an area and request a change. Pexo can use that context to work out whether related surrounding frames need updating too. THAT is an interesting job for a video agent. An edit has context beyond a single still. I'd still review the sequence afterwards.

    10430161780K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2026

    Add motion graphics to your videos with zero editing. All it takes is a few prompts with Claude Motion and the ElevenLabs MCP. Here’s how: https://t.co/zPGlCBeWop

    4211112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#aicreator#aifilmmaking#capcutpc#capcutsale#theworldscatchiestad

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 217 interactions against 51K followers, an engagement rate of 0.425%. Posts are seen about 72K times each, and 0.302% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 140.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 71% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 265 interactions. Recurring topics include #aicreator, #aifilmmaking, #capcutpc. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Kalsoom (ghotai )'s engagement rate on X?
Kalsoom (ghotai ) (@AIwithGhotai) has an engagement rate of 0.425%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 50,995 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.425%, Kalsoom (ghotai ) sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,004 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AIwithGhotai have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @AIwithGhotai post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going