Back to @AIHighlight's profile

AI Highlight engagement report

@AIHighlight - 626K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.027%
of 626K followers
Per impression
1.38%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
1.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
172
interactions (median)
Saved
0.406%
50 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.63/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 172 interactions against 626K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 23x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #capcutdidthat, #capcutworld.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #capcutdidthat, #capcutworld.

Compared with accounts its own size

AI Highlight's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 56% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, AI Highlight sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video81% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 81% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 176 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 202623x their median

    This is insane... AI just put all the iconic memes in one video🤯 https://t.co/StqmJ5YK7U

    3.1K6735828256K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20268.4x their median

    This AI performance has more emotion than half of Hollywood. https://t.co/MY3gwiST5l

    1.3K12458577K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20268.1x their median

    Big NEWS: Today we're launching Catch AI, an admin-assistant for busy executives. We started Catch with a simple idea: AI should actually do the administrative work executives hate doing themselves. Not suggest. Not summarize. Do. >> https://t.co/HI80mrmpay

    887108211194866K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20265.8x their median

    Holy smokes... how is this AI? https://t.co/fonp7Ijrk5

    8819818484K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20264.3x their median

    Someone finally made a web crawler that actually crawls the web. https://t.co/1qQS5hotQo

    6358216747K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20263.6x their median

    They used AI to put themselves in all the iconic movie scenes. The results are wild! https://t.co/fsA2lRmM9Z

    53070173218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20263.4x their median

    Make it Short. Make it Global. — the Global Short Drama Creator Awards are live. Follow + RT + Reply = 150 OnSolo Credits (72h only) How to join: 1. Follow @OnSoloAI 2. RT this post 3. Reply with anything — one word counts Credits land in your DMs within 3 business days. Can't make a 5-episode series yet? Start with one repost. $200,000 in cash awards is waiting: https://t.co/LT9VyU0EW1

    23299184711.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.0x their median

    Your SaaS can now make its own launch videos. Meet Wevi. Paste your URL, get a custom storyboard, select your screens + UI components straight from your browser, and turn your real product into cinematic content. You built the software. Now make it impossible to ignore. https://t.co/CSKtyguBhJ

    423473018258K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20263.0x their median

    Seedance 2.5 tops OpenArt’s AI video leaderboard. Wan 3.0 is second, Seedance 2.0 is third, and the rankings change across creative categories. Here’s where the rest of the models landed. https://t.co/0xMdGatBfm

    4584370111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.9x their median

    AI is getting out of hand 🤯 https://t.co/ZLsWYJgIE2

    4047915244K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#capcutdidthat#capcutworld

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 172 interactions against 626K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.38% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.99% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 81% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.9K interactions, about 23x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #capcutdidthat, #capcutworld.

What is AI Highlight's engagement rate on X?
AI Highlight (@AIHighlight) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 626,158 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, AI Highlight sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AIHighlight have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AIHighlight post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going