Back to @AIFashionChic's profile

AI Fashion Chic engagement report

@AIFashionChic - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
0.199%
8.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.71%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
17
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,688 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.6K times each, and 0.199% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.714% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 245 interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aivideo, #fashionfilm, #beautyfilm.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #aivideo, #fashionfilm, #beautyfilm.

Compared with accounts its own size

AI Fashion Chic's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,688 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 14% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, AI Fashion Chic sits below the 10th percentile of the 207,826 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.144%
p750.683%
p902.57%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 207,826 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,309 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.144%
75th percentile0.683%
90th percentile2.57%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 183 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 14, 202614x their median

    LadyBoss energy, but make it futuristic. 🖤 Power dressing for the next era. #FutureFashion #LadyBoss #AIFashion #FashionVisuals https://t.co/3wWbmP68Ho

    212275128K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20266.9x their median

    Fashion gets more interesting when the visuals carry a real story. Built this one as a short spy-thriller rather than a sequence of fashion shots — mission, access, security, obstacles, target. Made with Flova.
@Flovaai_Japan
#Flovaai #Flovacpp https://t.co/oVXq05DPhR

    105121031K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20266.1x their median

    Getting caught dancing is embarrassing. Until your witness has better timing than you. 😂 AFTER HOURS. #FashionFilm #AIvideo https://t.co/uLUXP1Ncg5

    9293031K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20265.9x their median

    Which detail makes the look — the icy blue satin, the sharp tailoring, or that final tie pull? For me, it’s the attitude. #AIFashion #FashionFilm #EditorialStyle https://t.co/tYlniCepZR

    82136021K viewsView on X
  • May 28, 20264.3x their median

    Marble mood + bow blouse + thigh-high boots. 🖤🤍 Wall pose → low-angle step → hair touch → full turn → final power pose. This is how an outfit sells: silhouette first, attitude second. #AIFashionChic #AIFashion #OfficeStyle #FashionReel #OutfitShowcase https://t.co/SZiaO9G7cF

    724205.8K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20263.8x their median

    A model walking through a beautiful space isn’t a concept. Pressure is. Closing doors. A flash. A missed elevator. A reaction. Give the character something to deal with — and suddenly the fashion has energy. #FashionFilm #AIFashion #CreativeAI #EditorialFashion https://t.co/lFkY0UpViW

    51113027K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20263.4x their median

    Pink energy, glossy confidence, and a little motion 💗 A playful AI beauty story created with Flova Agent Flow. Made with Flova. @Flovaai_Japan #Flovaai #Flovacpp https://t.co/PNjwwWwMeF

    32241154K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20262.1x their median

    Sometimes the best product demo isn’t about the product. It’s about the feeling it creates. One melody starts in the headphones… and ends at the #Headphones #AudioDesign #Music #LuxuryTech #ProductStorytelling #AIContent #AIFashionchic https://t.co/0DcERvqMj5

    16292015K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.6x their median

    An invitation arrived. The jacket chose the destination.❄️ From a quiet mountain suite to the slopes and après-ski—one winter look, told as a story. Would you wear it for your next winter escape? Made with Flova. @Flovaai_Japan #Flovaai #Flovacpp https://t.co/PYmgKd5atT

    20241016K viewsView on X
  • May 14, 20262.1x their median

    Boardroom energy → one call → clean exit → car ride → dinner table. 📞🚗🍷 Same look. Same face. Same confidence. That’s how a fashion story stays premium. #AIFashionChic #PowerLook #OfficeStyle #LuxuryFashion #AIvideo https://t.co/b4l49hZIjA

    2782110K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#aivideo#fashionfilm#beautyfilm#creativeai#aifashion

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 17 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,688 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 8.6K times each, and 0.199% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.714% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 245 interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aivideo, #fashionfilm, #beautyfilm.

What is AI Fashion Chic's engagement rate on X?
AI Fashion Chic (@AIFashionChic) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,198,504 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, AI Fashion Chic sits below the 10th percentile of the 207,826 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AIFashionChic have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,688 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AIFashionChic post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going