Back to @AHMEDALZAMER's profile

AHMED ALZAMER engagement report

@AHMEDALZAMER - 143K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.082%
of 143K followers
Per impression
0.288%
41K views on a typical post
Reach
28.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
117
interactions (median)
Saved
0.174%
70 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 117 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 0.288% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.1K interactions, about 44x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #خرافات_غذائية.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.082%, AHMED ALZAMER sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 152 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 202644x their median

    URGENT: Go to your medicine cabinet and find your B12 supplement, your multivitamin or your b12 complex that you are currently taking. Now take a look at the ingredients. If it says cyanocobalamin, anywhere on the container, kindly throw it in the trash; where it belongs. When cyanocobalamin is metabolized, the cyanide group is released as “cyanide” They’ll tell you it’s “safe and effective” or that it’s only a small amount. But that small amount is found in so many things you’ve been consuming since you were born, including everything from baby formula to energy drinks. Use methylcobalamin, hydroxocobalamin, or adenosylcobalamin, which do NOT contain a CYANIDE . Cobalamin= B12 Cyano=cyanide #Health #b12 #methylcobalamin, #hydroxocobalamin #adenosylcobalamin

    4.0K9999131581K viewsView on X
  • Apr 14, 202625x their median

    في علبة سردين صغيرة: ٣٣٠٪ من حاجتك اليومية من فيتامين ب١٢ ١٠٠٪ من حاجتك اليومية من أوميغا ٣ ٩٦٪ من حاجتك اليومية من السيلينيوم ٢٧٪ من حاجتك اليومية من فيتامين دال ٣٥٪ من حاجتك اليومية من الكالسيوم ٥٠٪ من حاجتك اليومية من البروتين ١٥٪ من حاجتك اليومية من الدهون غير المشبعة ١٧٪ من حاجتك اليومية من الصوديوم كل هذا في ١٠٪ فقط من حاجتك اليومية من السعرات الحرارية. ثم تذهب بعد هذا تبحث عن مكملات! #عبدوليات

    2.5K27715311481K viewsView on X
  • Dec 9, 202424x their median

    الإستشارة عن المكملات الغذائية بمبلغ رمزي إلي يبغى يسأل عن مكمل غذائي بمكونات جيدة يطلب يكلمني خاص✉️

    897731.9K311.3M viewsView on X
  • Nov 24, 202517x their median

    أفضل فيتامين بالحياة.. فضلوه وطبقوه وانشروه بعد استشارة الطبيب المختص فمايناسب غيرك قد لايناسبك #الاتحاد_الدحيل #الاهلي_الشارقه https://t.co/Cj4lj6x7fY

    1.7K222182213K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20261.9x their median

    دايم تجيني اساله وش نوتيلا الي تستخدمه ؟؟؟ صراحه اخذ هذي لانها بدون سكر وتعتبر افضل من النوتيلا العاديه وسعرها مناسب بعد 👌🏾 سعرها 20 ريال رابط المنتج 👇 https://t.co/ndryWcEaAS https://t.co/7rUD43wGe3

    20297350K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    ⚠️هذه ليست لبنة، هذه شبيهة لبنة أول مكون من المكونات فيها بعد الماء هو زيت النخيل المهدرج، يعني زيت النخيل المهدرج أكثر شي في شبيهة اللبنة هذه وفيها كاراجينان أيضاً https://t.co/QsGJuVQx98

    3142288K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    مارس بنكهة التوت عالي بالبروتين وقليل بالسكر وآخرتها يحتوي على دهن النخيل🥴 https://t.co/0KFkQegq94

    822131K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#خرافات_غذائية

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 117 interactions against 143K followers, an engagement rate of 0.082%. Posts are seen about 41K times each, and 0.288% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 28.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.1K interactions, about 44x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is AHMED ALZAMER's engagement rate on X?
AHMED ALZAMER (@AHMEDALZAMER) has an engagement rate of 0.082%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 143,322 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.082%, AHMED ALZAMER sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AHMEDALZAMER have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @AHMEDALZAMER post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going