Back to @AFTVMedia's profile

AFTV engagement report

@AFTVMedia - 1.0M followers on X

Measured over 688 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.021%
of 1.0M followers
Per impression
0.986%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
2.08%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
208
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
24.83/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 208 interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 688 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.986% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 24.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 688 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 112K interactions, about 179x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fancams, #aftvlive, #biasedpremierleague.

Measured over 688 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #fancams, #aftvlive, #biasedpremierleague.

Compared with accounts its own size

AFTV's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.021%, AFTV sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link28% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 28% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 157 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 27, 2022179x their median

    Kai Havertz is the best on earth. ๐ŸŽถ

    71K32K2.7K6.6K8.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026104x their median

    From a fearless teenager with a dream to a Premier League champion with Arsenal. โค๏ธ๐Ÿ† Seven years of passion, unforgettable goals and memories that will last forever. Thank you for everything, Gabi. ๐Ž๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐š ๐†๐ฎ๐ง๐ง๐ž๐ซ, ๐š๐ฅ๐ฐ๐š๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐š ๐†๐ฎ๐ง๐ง๐ž๐ซ! ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ”ดโšช https://t.co/DcbtWsa339

    19K2.3K6750147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202679x their median

    ๐Ÿ† Premier League winner, Community Shield winner, Champions League runner-up, World Cup third-place finisher - all while playing over 5,000 minutes last season... What more do you need to do, Declan!? Daylight robbery! ๐Ÿคฆ https://t.co/V8AUca8IZb

    13K1.5K1.5K607664K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202665x their median

    Gabriel Martinelli was pictured full of happiness in Arsenalโ€™s latest training session! ๐Ÿ˜†โค๏ธ https://t.co/FwAeQecfZ0

    13K5399267255K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202661x their median

    ๐Ÿšจ ๐ˆ๐“โ€™๐’ ๐Ž๐…๐…๐ˆ๐‚๐ˆ๐€๐‹! Bruno Guimarรฃes is a Gunner! ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท๐Ÿ”ด What a signing. What a statement. ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ”ฅ https://t.co/B5OVoDB77l

    11K45386380814M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202660x their median

    Congratulations on making your professional debut for Arsenal today, Theo Julienne! ๐Ÿ‘ https://t.co/vZUQCRZf05

    12K481161082K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202657x their median

    ๐Ÿ“Š Three of Christos Tzolis' four assists for Arsenal in all competitions have been for Martin ร˜degaard. ๐Ÿ‘€โšฝ ๐๐จ๐ซ๐ง ๐š๐ฉ๐š๐ซ๐ญ, ๐๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐จ๐ซ ๐ž๐š๐œ๐ก ๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐ž๐ซ! โค๏ธ https://t.co/Iqi9tsobH8

    11K703341166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202651x their median

    Seeing Leandro Trossard in the stands for our London derby against Chelsea felt like heโ€™d never left us. ๐Ÿฅนโค๏ธ You gave us moments weโ€™ll never forget, Leo. ๐˜๐จ๐ฎโ€™๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐š๐ฅ๐ฐ๐š๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐›๐ž ๐จ๐ง๐ž ๐จ๐Ÿ ๐ฎ๐ฌ. ๐Ÿซถ๐Ÿ”ด https://t.co/28MIqQxEPX

    10K51442799K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202651x their median

    A final goodbye to our Brazilian star. ๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ทโค๏ธ You gave us electric moments, spectacular goals and the glory we had waited so long for. Your name will forever be part of Arsenal history. ๐Ž๐›๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐š๐๐จ, ๐†๐š๐›๐ข. ๐Ž๐ง๐œ๐ž ๐š ๐†๐ฎ๐ง๐ง๐ž๐ซ, ๐š๐ฅ๐ฐ๐š๐ฒ๐ฌ ๐š ๐†๐ฎ๐ง๐ง๐ž๐ซ. ๐Ÿ”ดโšช https://t.co/D7IKLjf42u

    9.7K778672382K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202651x their median

    If Man City are punished over those 114 charges, we MUST find a way to reunite this perfect duo at Arsenalโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ˜‰๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ด Agent Martin, you know what to do! ๐Ÿ‘€ https://t.co/kT4FUiCe8X

    9.8K54413443128K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fancams#aftvlive#biasedpremierleague#matchpreview#foureverarsenal

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 208 interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.021%. Measured over 688 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.986% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 24.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 688 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 112K interactions, about 179x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #fancams, #aftvlive, #biasedpremierleague.

What is AFTV's engagement rate on X?
AFTV (@AFTVMedia) has an engagement rate of 0.021%, based on the median interactions across 688 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,014,715 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.021%, AFTV sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AFTVMedia have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AFTVMedia post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 24.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going