Back to @ABCChinese's profile

ABC中文 engagement report

@ABCChinese - 544K followers on X

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.007%
of 544K followers
Per impression
0.421%
9.4K views on a typical post
Reach
1.72%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
40
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.47/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 544K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 0.421% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

Measured over 44 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ABC中文's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 27% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, ABC中文 sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video93% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 158 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 3, 202630x their median

    2023年10月,新州卧龙岗大学的中国留学生蒋安桐在海滩发现一名泳客遇险后前往施救,自己却被卷入大海不幸身亡。 他获追授今年澳大利亚“英勇行为嘉奖”。 蒋安桐母亲的朋友张女士说,他的父母得知儿子获此荣誉流下了眼泪,称希望这份荣誉能让人们记住这名中国留学生的勇气,也提醒人们“生命的可贵”。 https://t.co/ukrmYFoVqL

    1.0K90671293K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20268.1x their median

    最新统计显示,尼泊尔与西藏边界泥石流灾难已造成两国近800人遇难、3000多人失踪。两名尼泊尔官员向路透社透露,今年5月中尼举行冰川风险会议后,尼方并未从中方获取期望中的足够冰川风险与水文数据。详文:https://t.co/KmawanaAHn https://t.co/EUo4124vHw

    113231761129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20266.8x their median

    香港知名民主活动人士黄之锋承认“串谋勾结外国势力”罪,这项国安罪行最高可判处终身监禁。数名西方外交官出席庭审。 29岁的黄之锋因反修例运动成为国际知名人物,目前正因另一项国安罪名服刑。他被控与流亡海外的前香港立法会议员罗冠聪等人串谋,呼吁外国政府及组织对中国和香港实施制裁或封锁。 https://t.co/IjqiV1y8mz

    1434282318K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.4x their median

    视频显示,尼泊尔特里苏利河洪水滚滚而来,沿岸的迈隆(Mailung)村遭猛烈冲击,汹涌洪水迅速淹没村庄。现场画面令人震惊。 https://t.co/DhHGRdkDST

    1252562426K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.1x their median

    中国政府指责“个别国家诋毁香港法治、干涉中国内政”。上周,香港一法庭依据《国安法》裁定支联会前主席李卓人、前副主席邹幸彤“煽动颠覆国家政权”罪名成立。两人最高可被判处10年监禁。 美国、欧盟和澳大利亚等国家对此发表声明感到担忧,敦促北京不要打压言论、集会、媒体、社会等自由。 https://t.co/PbnHbyhflS

    1171670217K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20265.0x their median

    普京与习近平本周末将出席在印度举行的金砖国家峰会,但俄方表示,目前没有安排两人单独会晤。两人预计将在11月于深圳举行的亚太经合组织峰会期间举行深入会谈。 这是习近平时隔七年首次访问印度,凸显中国对金砖合作的重视。伊朗、南非、埃及和印尼总统也将出席峰会,联合国秘书长古特雷斯预计与会。 https://t.co/TPHjCjTLlj

    125181014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20264.8x their median

    澳洲与所罗门群岛原则上就一项新条约达成协议。泄露信息显示,澳方拟追加超过9.8亿澳元援助,涵盖免费教育、签证改善、安全合作。协议谈判期间,所总理瓦勒曾面临不信任动议,但最终保住职位。澳方担心若瓦勒下台,条约可能受阻,敦促尽快敲定协议。所前总理索加瓦雷长期指责澳洲干涉所罗门群岛内政。 https://t.co/1gEDvXirWX

    224165112K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20264.8x their median

    2018年,西澳州偏远鲨鱼湾地区公路旁,两名探宝者Leon Deschamps和Shayne Thomson曾发现了一尊明代青铜佛像,此尊罕见的佛像有15厘米高,至今至少有500年历史。 近来,这两名探宝者决定将其正式归还给中国政府,以表达和平与善意。这尊佛像将带着来自鲨鱼湾的红土以及一枚金色的珍珠贝壳返回中国。 https://t.co/gQFMC8JWXl

    1411234418K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20264.6x their median

    中国媒体报道,今天上午因尼泊尔一侧发生泥石流,造成西藏日喀则市吉隆县吉隆口岸重大人员伤亡、失联。目前,武警官兵已赶赴抢险救灾。习近平指示,当务之急要最大限度减少人员伤亡。 尼泊尔外交部说,地震引发雪崩,进而导致洪水。该国旅游局说,目前384名游客失踪,包括291名外国公民。 https://t.co/6pZvoQsrM9

    983349532K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.6x their median

    在刚刚过去的周日,香港独立书店“留下书舍”关门歇业。停业前,民众排起长队入内与店员交谈、选购书籍,向书店告别。 7月14日,该书店表示因经营、财务、社会环境等因素将于8月30日停业,次日便因涉嫌售卖煽动性书籍遭警方查抄,五人被捕。 “留下书舍”由已停办媒体《立场新闻》的前记者在2022年创办。 https://t.co/aG7y9yy2nW

    1332522417K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 544K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 44 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 0.421% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 44 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

What is ABC中文's engagement rate on X?
ABC中文 (@ABCChinese) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 44 original posts from the last 30 days against 544,045 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, ABC中文 sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ABCChinese have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ABCChinese post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going