Back to @9mmsmg's profile

9mmSMG engagement report

@9mmsmg - 261K followers on X

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.341%
of 261K followers
Per impression
3.72%
24K views on a typical post
Reach
9.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
892
interactions (median)
Saved
0.088%
21 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.57/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 892 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.341%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 3.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 70x its own typical post.

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

9mmSMG's engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 80% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.341%, 9mmSMG sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 307 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Nov 8, 202570x their median

    Communism is when you collectively pretend the 1st woman is more attractive than the 2nd woman. https://t.co/FbAx6WctD6

    64K2.9K4.8K2.5K13M viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202625x their median

    Double G. Oui https://t.co/RAxkuz4ORN

    21K8305123053.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202617x their median

    Marines and Sailors from the USS Abraham Lincoln were spotted letting loose at a club in Thailandβ€”shirts off and swinging them in the air while hitting the dance floor πŸ˜‚πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΉπŸ‡­ https://t.co/cY0zopDyGm

    14K9023843038.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202610x their median

    I had my license checked for Velo nicotine pouches today and I was just thinking about how when I was a teenager there were cigarette vending machines. No ID, nothing. You'd just stick money in it and select a pack you wanted and it'd drop it down. It was the wild west and I miss it. The total sissificafion of society has been a disaster.

    8.0K48169982117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20269.4x their median

    As bad as the Clancy case is, imagine how many mothers get away with murdering their babies and claim its SIDS.

    8.0K323842069K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20268.6x their median

    had a massive case of the sads this week and didn’t kill anyone please everyone congratulate me on this ultimate feat

    7.3K154148986K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20267.9x their median

    A retrial for Lindsay Clancy in Massachusetts is going to at best lead to another hung jury. In all likelihood, she would be found not guilty because it was 11 to one this run. There isn't really a world where she is convicted of 1st degree murder. Someone asked "why even have a retrial if they can't convict?" My answer is to cause her emotional distress. We can't have justice, but we can at the very least make it uncomfortable for as long as possible. We should drag it out. We should make her relive it over and over. We should hold her as long as humanly possible in a mental hospital before she's inevitably released. We should make her hear about how she executed her children 1000 times and 1000 times more. Expensive? Yes. But we have to do something. This gross miscarriage of justice has me so incredibly blackpilled.

    6.5K23230014273K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20265.7x their median

    πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ” πŸ“ arizona_burger_bar - arizona.burgerr https://t.co/ojARLqxDWw

    4.0K2126032462.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20265.1x their median

    β€œThis is what 150lbs and 5’7 of obesity looks like,btw” https://t.co/T6hCTHZzU9

    2.6K531.4K4426.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.6x their median

    It looks out there is a single man being the hold out in the Clancy trial and her attorney was trying to get him kicked out. The lone juror: https://t.co/V2J01LnfC4

    4.0K10350457K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 892 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.341%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 80% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 24K times each, and 3.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.19% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 74K interactions, about 70x its own typical post.

What is 9mmSMG's engagement rate on X?
9mmSMG (@9mmsmg) has an engagement rate of 0.341%, based on the median interactions across 66 original posts from the last 30 days against 260,759 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.341%, 9mmSMG sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @9mmsmg have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 80% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @9mmsmg post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going