Back to @971theticketxyt's profile

97.1 The Ticket: engagement report

@971theticketxyt - 182K followers on X

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 182K followers
Per impression
0.286%
2.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 182K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.286% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126 interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dancampbell, #detroitlions, #lions.

Measured over 78 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026. Recurring tags: #dancampbell, #detroitlions, #lions.

Compared with accounts its own size

97.1 The Ticket:'s engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, 97.1 The Ticket: sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link9% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 9% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 93 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 14, 202616x their median

    Michigan adds two players in the middle of the season https://t.co/FZTejq6r9R

    108512130K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 202612x their median

    How do you feel about the DeBrincat signing? https://t.co/5HlA4aCEmN

    37049818K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202611x their median

    Shawn Horcoff on whether Dylan Larkin could become distraction for Red Wings: "We’re a better team with Dylan in our lineup." The plan for next captain: "That’ll work itself out." Says he has "full authority to make decisions on all hockey operations," including a Larkin trade. https://t.co/2RkkNcCewr

    7366017K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20268.3x their median

    Does DeBrincat like losing? https://t.co/ownXUR9qrq

    7054533K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20267.8x their median

    What did you make of the Larkin press conference? https://t.co/2m6mb0y4UD

    524514.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20267.3x their median

    Ross Tucker on what the Lions should do with Juice Scruggs https://t.co/rj6Qr8ggmL

    4547217K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20266.9x their median

    Shawn Horcoff on how he approaches decisions as interim GM: "My goal is to prove that I can do a good job and remove this interim tag." "A rebuild, to me, is out of the question. We have too many good players in that lineup. The last three years we’ve been really close." https://t.co/gEjH7Gvt3m

    3921408.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20266.3x their median

    Shouldn't the Red Wings be rebuilding? https://t.co/b0jpANesD5

    11133514K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20265.0x their median

    Red Wings interim GM Shawn Horcoff on Steve Yzerman: "I think the world of Steve. He’s been an unbelievable mentor, a friend.” “He’s left this organization in a good place. We have good players, we’re close, we’re right there. He’s built our prospect pool." https://t.co/U28Dh3yOuq

    360408.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.5x their median

    Was the Dylan Larkin press conference a waste of time? https://t.co/dqRYqrCieV

    332104.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dancampbell#detroitlions#lions#nfl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 182K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 78 original posts, its engagement rate beats 15% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.286% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 78 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 9% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126 interactions, about 16x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dancampbell, #detroitlions, #lions.

What is 97.1 The Ticket:'s engagement rate on X?
97.1 The Ticket: (@971theticketxyt) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 78 original posts from the last 30 days against 181,834 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, 97.1 The Ticket: sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @971theticketxyt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 15% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @971theticketxyt post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going