Back to @8KIZS's profile

ًً engagement report

@8KIZS - 110K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.187%
of 110K followers
Per impression
2.65%
7.8K views on a typical post
Reach
7.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
207
interactions (median)
Saved
0.064%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 207 interactions against 110K followers, an engagement rate of 0.187%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 2.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ًً's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.187%, ًً sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 160 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 202663x their median

    💖: Chris omg I completely forgot about this, but one time there was this man who wouldn’t leave me alone and kept asking for my number, and I kept telling him I had a boyfriend even though I didn’t, anyways I showed him a picture or you cuz I had you as my wallpaper and I — https://t.co/BUybaZcUwO

    12K98011245166K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202648x their median

    💖: Chan my physical therapist loves using you against me so I actually do my exercises! He’s always like “make Chan proud!” So lease know I am doing my best to make you proud 🫡 🐺: MAKE ME PROUD! https://t.co/ysfPwsVlX6

    9.1K82314655K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202647x their median

    💖: Chris how are you making out with the jet lag? Hopefully it wasn’t too bad. 🐺: You can kiss jet lag…? Hahahahahahahahaha https://t.co/g3XPE1rtit

    8.5K57435541134K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202633x their median

    💖: Chris, honestly, how often do you lurk? We need to know if we’re safe. 🐺🔊: All the time! *whispers* https://t.co/YSdrPdBqgR

    5.8K73918211109K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202630x their median

    💖: looking for STAYs who will lock Chan up in a praise prison and talk next to him all day long, and tell him how amazing and cool of a person he is 🐺: please don’t do that https://t.co/EkQSElSwcz

    5.7K41158962K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202617x their median

    💖: Please tell me about the sky tonight in Latam! 🐺: It’s cloudy… With a chance of meatballs https://t.co/stss6MVX01

    3.3K20956633K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202615x their median

    💖: oppa, can you please just say “hyunzales” once in a voice message? 🥹 🐺🔊: hyunzales https://t.co/hwLaauZKpk

    2.6K41423351K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202613x their median

    💖: if Chan replies to this, I’ll go outside and lay in a patch of grass to connect with nature again 😭 🐺: Tbh we all need it (Including me) https://t.co/hXGhDEMy2g

    2.3K25932820K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202612x their median

    💖: Chan, can you say “I know I’m a menace to all Stays and have zero regrets” 😫😂😂😂 🐺: No need to say it cause I already know it haha https://t.co/dN0Gs1lwB8

    2.3K21602526K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202612x their median

    💖: Oh my Gooooossh!! Why are you so handsome?! I’m going to cry! 😭😭 🐺: Back off, that’s my wife https://t.co/WifQ6Botnf

    1.9K343720889K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 207 interactions against 110K followers, an engagement rate of 0.187%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 2.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.08% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 63x its own typical post.

What is ًً's engagement rate on X?
ًً (@8KIZS) has an engagement rate of 0.187%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 110,291 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.187%, ًً sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @8KIZS have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @8KIZS post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going