Back to @82WztfvhHqZz0Ub's profile

金融Angel engagement report

@82WztfvhHqZz0Ub - 96K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.141%
of 96K followers
Per impression
1.07%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
13.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
136
interactions (median)
Saved
0.047%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.83/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 136 interactions against 96K followers, an engagement rate of 0.141%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 8.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

金融Angel's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.141%, 金融Angel sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 84 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 20268.9x their median

    Bank of Japan may lose credibility after Scott Bessent's intervention 🚨 🚨 https://t.co/M8kqXog1ju

    9661653640122K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.8x their median

    多说一句: 以后私事、公事都会比较多,无法象之前那样一心维护这个推,备受煎熬还不时被骂,有心无力,但是关键时刻会发推,不管是黄金、白银,还是大盘、加密,都能保命,然后再后来关键时刻还能抄底翻身,不会忘记多年的老铁粉。 希望老铁粉也都能互相理解,十年了我也长大了,需要有自己的时间处理自己的私事,再也不是那个一往无前的女侠了。

    16018808.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.6x their median

    今日多发一点推,主要是推上很多人非常的不道德,只有三日的眼光,三日不达就骂,而且骂的让人抹眼泪,不得已才不再继续公开发推,太难了,哭过很多次。 以后只在某些重要时间点发推,希望老铁继续支持。

    15305808.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    比特币142K,以太坊4500,币股三剑客低位都至少翻倍。 以上今年全部都会到达,祝愿所有铁粉发财!!! 后续要接着搞什么,等重要时间点再说。 https://t.co/uGvljKFjrL

    145539128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    与过去做个了结: 我们曾经的荐股,币股三剑客: COIN, CRCL, HOOD 全部都兑现,那些曾经吹过的牛,还真不是吹的,全部是真牛,没有对不起铁粉。 祝大家祝末愉快!

    139426111K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 2026

    对于前期我看空黄金,我想说的是:我不是内心想看空它,而是不得不看空它。 对于现在我看多金银,我想说的是:我不是内心想看多它,而是我不得不看多它。 在多空转换点,我及时准确的表达了我的判断,黄金的老铁们,都能互相理解不?

    84075147K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    拜登掌权时期,在高通胀情况下,舆论加持美联储连续降息三次。 川普掌权时期,在核心CPI下行,舆论加持要求美联储连续加息。 这就是政治与党争,舆论与现实,从来没有什么公平正义,所有强加的屈辱与痛苦,一代人的时间会抹去所有的记忆,就如股市一般,新生代从来没有经历过类似1997-2007的痛苦,更没有70年代十年震荡的噩梦,所以他们一定会被打上一个历史标记,要么是70年代,要么是00年代,总之他们不会这么无忧无虑的幸福一生。

    127812137K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    现在很多加密数字货币交易所都推出“虚拟美股”,币民可以直接买美股了; 而美债无风险收益年化将近5%,我想知道哪家加密数字货币交易所可以直接买美债?

    59062229K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    https://t.co/HgE0JpxOZc

    87214014K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    MRNA,翻倍! 没有让跟单的老粉失望。 加油!

    81017019K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 136 interactions against 96K followers, an engagement rate of 0.141%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.2K interactions, about 8.9x its own typical post.

What is 金融Angel's engagement rate on X?
金融Angel (@82WztfvhHqZz0Ub) has an engagement rate of 0.141%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 96,084 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.141%, 金融Angel sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @82WztfvhHqZz0Ub have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @82WztfvhHqZz0Ub post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going