Back to @520Promotion's profile

520 PROMOTIONS LLC engagement report

@520Promotion - 172K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.002%
of 172K followers
Per impression
0.364%
1.1K views on a typical post
Reach
0.64%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.33/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Thursday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 172K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 0.364% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.639% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12 interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dirtywater, #fibawc, #gambling𝕏. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026. Recurring tags: #dirtywater, #fibawc, #gambling𝕏.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, 520 PROMOTIONS LLC sits below the 10th percentile of the 158,036 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.605%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 158,036 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,981 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.605%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 106 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 24, 20263.0x their median

    . @whatsuptucson crazy amounts of unmarked cops suv and armored truck style vehicles just went behind the 711 on 29th and alvernon https://t.co/kxxsxDZGMx

    82202.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.8x their median

    Talk to me nice #PokemonGo #pokemonㅤㅤㅤ https://t.co/Spj9o6vVFY

    5020634 viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20261.5x their median

    🌏🏀FIBA Asia games in 4 hours tossing dice on🇨🇳 China -4.5 -120 #FIBAWC #StepItUp @FIBAAsiaCup @FIBA @courtsideapp #Gambling𝕏 https://t.co/9L64WshyJ3

    40111.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    FBI need to look at the refs in the BILLS game smh

    31101.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    If anyone wants to know if @courtsideapp Casino is legit short answer HELL YEA https://t.co/ENP9z2ThmI

    1110408 viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    Sports Books: Sam Darnold slips wont be voided he should have got his 200+ passing yards and 3 TDS on the first drive 🤷‍♂️

    30001.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 2026

    So is everyone's Promos taken away on @theScore or just mine 🤔 been like this for the past 3 days https://t.co/sGUt5jJ6Zn

    2010541 viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 2026

    +187 live halftime Mexico ML🍻⚽️🇲🇽🇲🇽 @BetMGM #Gambling𝕏 https://t.co/0nkCE07riZ

    1011594 viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Just laser engraved this #BILLS @BuffaloBills #Billieve #BILLSMAFIA https://t.co/GUNJrfGbuO

    1010732 viewsView on X
  • Jul 25, 2026

    So the Phillies never seen a bat now ?

    20001.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dirtywater#fibawc#gambling𝕏#guardsball#stepitup

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 172K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Posts are seen about 1.1K times each, and 0.364% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.639% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.33 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12 interactions, about 3.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dirtywater, #fibawc, #gambling𝕏. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is 520 PROMOTIONS LLC's engagement rate on X?
520 PROMOTIONS LLC (@520Promotion) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 171,699 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, 520 PROMOTIONS LLC sits below the 10th percentile of the 158,036 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @520Promotion have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @520Promotion post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going