Back to @45PedroMartinez's profile

Pedro Martinez engagement report

@45PedroMartinez - 255K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.228%
of 255K followers
Per impression
2.19%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
10.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
580
interactions (median)
Saved
0.034%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 580 interactions against 255K followers, an engagement rate of 0.228%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 2.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #mlbontbs.

Compared with accounts its own size

Pedro Martinez's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 65% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.228%, Pedro Martinez sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 160 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 20266.0x their median

    I couldn’t be happier for the Brewers and my favorite manager. They earned it. @Brewers

    3.3K17519548K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20266.0x their median

    Contreras is that guy who rubs off on everybody! He genuinely cares about his teammates and won’t back down if something happens that affects them. He protects the team, and I love that about him!

    3.3K13728861K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20265.5x their median

    I believe the Blue Jays didn’t come out as they wanted to after the World Series.

    2.8K63189123819K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20265.4x their median

    Roberto Clemente wasn’t just a hero to Puerto Rico but to all of us. He spoke on behalf of Latin American players and of people. He was the light at the end of the tunnel for all of us, and I’m here because of him. We should all understand that baseball goes beyond the sport we play.

    2.7K387441361K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20265.1x their median

    I wish Judge well because he’s a true ambassador of the game. The kind of player we need to see on the field everyday. A role model for the game of baseball. @TheJudge44

    2.8K134441481K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20264.4x their median

    The Shark (Wrobleski): He’s a bully. His pace impresses me. 97 to 98 and great command.

    2.4K104211064K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20263.5x their median

    Dodger Stadium is one of the oldest but one of the prettiest and with such history. They represented their organization well tonight.

    1.9K8116477K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20263.3x their median

    I need the Rays to keep playing their brand of baseball: cause chaos on the bases, play defense, and pitch. They have the pieces to do it, and, in my opinion, the best manager in the American League.

    1.7K145181055K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.5x their median

    The best two records in baseball: The Tampa Bay Rays and the Milwaukee Brewers. They play the same kind of baseball and have the two best managers. #mlbontbs

    1.4K5427437K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.3x their median

    Milwaukee continues to bring in players who fit exactly what they do best: play great defense, pitch well, and execute the fundamentals almost to perfection. And they have the right manager to make it all work.

    1.2K6121833K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mlbontbs

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 580 interactions against 255K followers, an engagement rate of 0.228%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 2.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.5K interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post.

What is Pedro Martinez's engagement rate on X?
Pedro Martinez (@45PedroMartinez) has an engagement rate of 0.228%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 255,151 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.228%, Pedro Martinez sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @45PedroMartinez have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @45PedroMartinez post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going