PlayerSells
Back to @433's profile

433 engagement report

@433 - 6.3M followers on X

Measured over 171 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.177%
of 6.3M followers
Per impression
5.60%
198K views on a typical post
Reach
3.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
11K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.039%
78 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.7/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 11K interactions against 6.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.177%. Measured over 171 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 1,223 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 198K times each, and 5.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 171 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 97K interactions, about 8.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 171 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

433's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,223 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 98% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.177%, 433 sits above the 50th percentile of the 13,760 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.055% to 0.358%.

p100.001%
p250.008%
p50 (median)0.055%
p750.358%
p902.39%
p99272.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 13,760 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 272,770 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.008%
50th percentile0.055%
75th percentile0.358%
90th percentile2.39%
99th percentile272.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%18K
01:00 UTC+1%18K
02:00 UTC-1%18K
03:00 UTC-4%18K
04:00 UTC-7%15K
05:00 UTC-6%14K
06:00 UTC-6%16K
07:00 UTC-6%17K
08:00 UTC-6%20K
09:00 UTC-3%23K
10:00 UTC-2%25K
11:00 UTC-2%26K
12:00 UTC0%29K
13:00 UTC0%33K
14:00 UTC-2%34K
15:00 UTC-1%36K
16:00 UTC-1%35K
17:00 UTC-1%33K
18:00 UTC+1%30K
19:00 UTC+1%28K
20:00 UTC-1%26K
21:00 UTC+1%23K
22:00 UTC+1%20K
23:00 UTC0%18K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%85K
Monday+2%88K
Tuesday+1%102K
Wednesday-3%87K
Thursday-1%82K
Friday-4%89K
Saturday+4%83K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+83%+77% to +89%7.0K
Outbound link24% of posts-48%-50% to -47%7.2K
Typical length--4%-6% to -3%9.4K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 83% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 24% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 48% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 211 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters run 4% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 20268.8x their median

    ๐Œ๐Ž ๐’๐€๐‹๐€๐‡ ๐’๐‡๐Ž๐–๐’ ๐–๐‡๐˜ ๐‡๐„'๐’ ๐“๐‡๐„ ๐„๐†๐˜๐๐“๐ˆ๐€๐ ๐Š๐ˆ๐๐† ๐€๐†๐€๐ˆ๐ ๐Ÿคด๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ท https://t.co/vjfmtIbqCx

    92K4.6K222148687K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20267.5x their median

    ๐€ ๐๐„๐– ๐Œ๐ˆ๐ƒ๐…๐ˆ๐„๐‹๐ƒ ๐Œ๐€๐„๐’๐“๐‘๐Ž ๐…๐Ž๐‘ ๐๐€๐‘๐‚๐„๐‹๐Ž๐๐€ ๐Ÿค https://t.co/C8R737lBdg

    78K3.8K14098565K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20265.1x their median

    ๐‰๐Ž๐€๐Ž ๐‚๐€๐๐‚๐„๐‹๐Ž & ๐‘๐Ž๐ƒ๐‘๐ˆ ๐ƒ๐Ž๐๐„ โœ”๏ธ ๐—ง๐—ช๐—ข ๐— ๐—”๐—ฆ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—ฉ๐—˜ ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช ๐—ฆ๐—œ๐—š๐—ก๐—œ๐—ก๐—š๐—ฆ ๐—™๐—ข๐—ฅ ๐—•๐—”๐—ฅ๐—–๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—ก๐—” ๐Ÿคฏ https://t.co/lTEdSzI6FV

    53K2.8K136154397K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.4x their median

    ๐—ฅ๐—ข๐——๐—ฅ๐—œ ๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—” ๐—ฉ๐—˜๐—ฅ๐—ฌ ๐—›๐—”๐—ฃ๐—ฃ๐—ฌ ๐— ๐—”๐—ก ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿ˜˜ https://t.co/zoLMUVvXuI

    47K1.6K8841380K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20264.4x their median

    ๐—๐—ข๐—ฆ๐—˜๐—Ÿ๐—จ ๐Ÿฎ.๐Ÿฌ https://t.co/VdEwpZXqLm

    47K1.9K7640342K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20264.4x their median

    Cristiano starts his 25th (!) season as footballer ๐Ÿคฏ ๐Ÿ“ธ @AlNassrFC https://t.co/lZhQ2W1X3Z

    46K2.1K22784492K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20264.3x their median

    ๐Ÿšจ ๐๐‘๐„๐€๐Š๐ˆ๐๐†: Raphinha is the new Barcelona captain, ESPN reports ยฉ๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ Raphinha was already Barcelona's third captain last season and has now been promoted to first captain. ๐Ÿ’ช https://t.co/3V92MNd66u

    45K2.5K186181472K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20264.2x their median

    ๐Ÿšจ ๐๐‘๐„๐€๐Š๐ˆ๐๐†: Trabzonspor have reached an agreement with Darwin Nรบรฑez, reports @yagosabuncuoglu The negotiations between Turkish club & Al Hilal are ongoing to finalize the transfer โณ Another โญ๏ธ joining the Sรผper Lig ๐Ÿ”œ https://t.co/SZ5A0nDRnT

    44K2.0K3875652.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.0x their median

    ๐—›๐—”๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—–๐—”๐—Ÿ๐—Ÿ๐—˜๐—— ๐—ฃ๐—˜๐—ฃ ๐—”๐—ก๐—— ๐—ญ๐—Ÿ๐—”๐—ง๐—”๐—ก ๐—ง๐—ข ๐—ฆ๐—›๐—ข๐—ช ๐—ข๐—™๐—™ ๐—›๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ก๐—˜๐—ช ๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐—ฅ๐—–๐—จ๐—ง ๐Ÿ˜‚ Pep: "You are lucky you have hair, I would love to have it" ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ‘จโ€๐Ÿฆฒ Zlatan: "Youโ€™ve lost a bet or what? Oh myโ€ฆ Block me and erase my number" ๐Ÿ˜‚ https://t.co/LkxBKn1VBO

    40K3.2K1842591.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20263.4x their median

    ๐–๐–๐ƒ๐–๐–๐– โ€” ๐‘๐„๐€๐‹ ๐Œ๐€๐ƒ๐‘๐ˆ๐ƒ ๐„๐๐ƒ ๐๐‘๐„-๐’๐„๐€๐’๐Ž๐ ๐”๐๐๐„๐€๐“๐„๐ ๐Ÿ˜Ž https://t.co/6sEVrstWmi

    37K1.2K8822299K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 11K interactions against 6.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.177%. Measured over 171 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 1,223 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 198K times each, and 5.60% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 171 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 97K interactions, about 8.8x its own typical post.

What is 433's engagement rate on X?
433 (@433) has an engagement rate of 0.177%, based on the median interactions across 171 original posts from the last 30 days against 6,268,477 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.177%, 433 sits above the 50th percentile of the 13,760 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @433 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,223 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @433 post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going