Back to @3FLnQe_VIP's profile

3FLnQe engagement report

@3FLnQe_VIP - 318K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.019%
of 318K followers
Per impression
0.637%
9.7K views on a typical post
Reach
3.06%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
62
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 318K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 0.637% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.6K interactions, about 59x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.019%, 3FLnQe sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video43% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 69 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 16, 202659x their median

    اي متخلف كرويا يقول لك ميسي دعس ابيك تدعس له هذا الفيديو ب ( جيبه ) 🙂 https://t.co/mrqCDNOzno

    3.0K4947523147K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202655x their median

    خسرت الارجنتين طرد على الارجنتين احتج ميسي لتغطيه كوكوريلا فمه ولم يطرد لتثبت للجميع ان (الموامره) و ( مدلل الفيفا ) و (مجهزه لميسي) ماهي الا نهيق لحمير كره القدم وسعادتهم بخساره ميسي ماهي الا اثبات اخر ان كاس العالم لقب غالي لايحققه الا الرجال فقط https://t.co/Spe0vaVlbR

    2.6K6441262068K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 202648x their median

    إذا أردت هزيمتي… فقابلني في النهائي . هكذا يرحل الكبار من الباب الكبير، وفي الجولة الأخيرة. كثيرون بكوا لأن حلمهم ضاع ولم يتحقق، أما أنت فبكيت لأنك لم تستطع تكرار حلمٍ سبق أن حققته. شكرًا يا ميسي… على كل لحظة صنعتها، وعلى كل ذكرى أمتعت بها عشاق كرة القدم. مهما كانت النهاية، سيبقى اسمك حاضرًا كأعظم من لمس الكرة. 🐐🇦🇷

    2.4K524156225K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202632x their median

    ميسي في عهد بلاتر ميسي في عهد انفانتينو https://t.co/dQfmwNFeMZ

    1.8K5414924482K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 202628x their median

    ارامل كريستيانو ومطلقات مبابي وبيلنغهام https://t.co/rHvXKY85V0

    1.4K261781069K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202623x their median

    بالله شم لنا النتيجه ماتذكرك بشيء https://t.co/YblwODQP6Q

    1.2K14064739K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 202611x their median

    احتفلوا واستمتعوا تخيل تضيع وقتك مع شخص فريقه مابقى نادي باوروبا ماسرقه وقاعد يستشرف عليك https://t.co/nWKcDel49S

    1.1K22828873K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 202611x their median

    بص الحركه دي ❤️ https://t.co/vAZ48x4WKt

    1.2K12743384K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202619x their median

    الصوره هذي بدأت تختفي وحذفوا تغريداتهم بعد اكتشاف ان رقم سبينس 25 وليس 23 https://t.co/Ki3wiRUajX

    1.1K60547180K viewsView on X
  • Jul 14, 202618x their median

    نداء لأرامل كريستيانو ومطلقات مبابي ابحثي لك عن رجل اخر يكون ند كفؤ للاسطوره ميسي https://t.co/Qz1D4kLCI4

    847192100435K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 62 interactions against 318K followers, an engagement rate of 0.019%. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 0.637% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.06% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.6K interactions, about 59x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is 3FLnQe's engagement rate on X?
3FLnQe (@3FLnQe_VIP) has an engagement rate of 0.019%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 317,820 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.019%, 3FLnQe sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @3FLnQe_VIP have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @3FLnQe_VIP post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going