Back to @300moods's profile

𝒻. engagement report

@300moods - 428K followers on X

Measured over 101 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.31%
of 428K followers
Per impression
6.66%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
4.66%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.306%
61 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.1/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 428K followers, an engagement rate of 0.31%. Measured over 101 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 6.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 101 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 98K interactions, about 74x its own typical post.

Measured over 101 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

𝒻.'s engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.31%, 𝒻. sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.698%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.147%
p750.698%
p902.61%
p9982.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 213,098 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,393 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.147%
75th percentile0.698%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 33 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 202674x their median

    film mug 🎞️ https://t.co/mQiIxjoFMn

    90K6.0K4291.3K2.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202664x their median

    my mood after buying that little thing I wanted https://t.co/9lcFoiWpfz

    64K20K120667995K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202648x their median

    https://t.co/LHiDKOXEJQ

    51K11K1991.2K1.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202631x their median

    life will find a way 🌸 https://t.co/Z2QKWCCicm

    33K8.0K611371.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202625x their median

    https://t.co/5STaNlB8hE

    28K4.6K23149253K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202624x their median

    https://t.co/abUv4113aM

    31K1.0K69144424K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202624x their median

    https://t.co/ZFY34TAthf

    24K7.3K20100321K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202623x their median

    https://t.co/XlCiIQ0Clx

    22K9.1K20165256K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202621x their median

    welcoming september https://t.co/x5e5CunEqS

    23K5.6K39200302K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202618x their median

    obsessed is an understatement https://t.co/lnkfeBtISF

    23K1.7K20101191K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.3K interactions against 428K followers, an engagement rate of 0.31%. Measured over 101 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 6.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 101 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 6% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 98K interactions, about 74x its own typical post.

What is 𝒻.'s engagement rate on X?
𝒻. (@300moods) has an engagement rate of 0.31%, based on the median interactions across 101 original posts from the last 30 days against 428,141 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.31%, 𝒻. sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,098 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @300moods have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @300moods post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going