Back to @247WallSt's profile

24/7 Wall St. engagement report

@247WallSt - 258K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 258K followers
Per impression
0.087%
2.3K views on a typical post
Reach
0.89%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 258K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 0.087% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.895% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8 interactions, about 4.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

24/7 Wall St.'s engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, 24/7 Wall St. sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link43% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 43% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 241 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 23, 20264.0x their median

    It’s gone?  📹: @daytrading on Instagram https://t.co/0mNlTwIXTk

    60203.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20263.5x their median

    Make better choices. Follow The AI Investors Podcast, and become wise. 🦉 https://t.co/Oe5pDzyjew 📹: @desh.group https://t.co/E6ZhIlEa4i

    70004.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20263.0x their median

    Three AI stocks investors should be watching in August 2026. ServiceNow is positioned for the rise of agentic AI workflows. ACM Research could benefit from China’s semiconductor and memory expansion. Celestica just crushed Wall Street’s expectations, with Google’s TPU ambitions helping drive explosive growth. Which AI stock has the biggest upside? Subscribe to The AI Investor Podcast and stay in the know!   https://t.co/4jMSQVE1Gq

    51002.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.5x their median

    Walmart’s stores are growing. Its e-commerce business is growing MUCH faster. Walmart same-store sales rose just 2.6%, while e-commerce jumped roughly 24% last quarter. That gap tells an interesting story about where one of America’s biggest retailers is finding growth, and why Walmart’s enormous network of stores and fulfillment infrastructure could be such a powerful advantage. Is $WMT quietly becoming an e-commerce powerhouse?

    301115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.5x their median

    Tesla, Rivian, and GM are all betting heavily on the future of autonomous driving. But right now, is Tesla still the company everyone else is chasing? https://t.co/IsKgU8py7p

    30202.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.5x their median

    Norway just raked in $184 billion. Why?  Hint: Nvidia and Apple. https://t.co/zAJ6SAqCdH

    50003.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.5x their median

    Could a ban on China transceivers redraw the optics map?  Applied Optoelectronics, Fabrinet, Coherent, Lumentum are all in play. Subscribe to the AI Investor Podcast to learn more!  https://t.co/PbxcPAGbMr https://t.co/whxrRj8j7y

    40102.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.0x their median

    Happy Labor Day! Don't work too hard. 💸 https://t.co/TERztzl3YB

    40002.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20261.5x their median

    Is Tesla really worth twenty-five times more than Ford? One investor says the maths doesn't add up.  Ford's making money on trucks and SUVs right now; Tesla's valuation is betting on EVs, robotics, robotaxis, and Musk's vision.  Hype or reality? https://t.co/0vHnswmh1h

    11102.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.5x their median

    Even the world’s richest person isn’t immune to a rough market. Can Musk climb back above the trillion-dollar mark? https://t.co/WOVe5Q3YnG

    30002.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 258K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.3K times each, and 0.087% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.895% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 43% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8 interactions, about 4.0x its own typical post.

What is 24/7 Wall St.'s engagement rate on X?
24/7 Wall St. (@247WallSt) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 257,909 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, 24/7 Wall St. sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @247WallSt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @247WallSt post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going