PacoJonesFL1 engagement report
@1PacoFL - 874K followers on X
Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 874K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 1% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.1K times each, and 0.019% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.586% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22 interactions, about 22x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #elon, #elonmusk.
Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 29, 2026. Recurring tags: #elon, #elonmusk.
Compared with accounts its own size
PacoJonesFL1's engagement rate beats 1% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 1% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At under 0.001%, PacoJonesFL1 sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.08% |
| 75th percentile | 0.433% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 160.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 51K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 50K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 53K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 43K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 42K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 48K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 52K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 61K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 70K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 72K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 78K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 86K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 94K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 97K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 101K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 98K |
| 17:00 UTC | -2% | 91K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 85K |
| 19:00 UTC | -1% | 80K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 74K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 66K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 57K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 52K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +4% | 231K |
| Monday | 0% | 288K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 278K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 251K |
| Thursday | -1% | 245K |
| Friday | -3% | 253K |
| Saturday | +3% | 227K |
Best tweets
- Aug 29, 202622x their median
Can't wait to ride in one next week. https://t.co/5CpijSIx8p
- Aug 16, 20269.0x their median
This is hot!!!
- Aug 28, 20268.0x their median
Elon says he’s not a dancing puppet: “I’m not your dancing puppet!” Then the music starts and he immediately becomes one. The gap between the image people try to force on him and the version that actually shows up is the whole point. https://t.co/mpFhLEIc1x
- Aug 28, 20266.0x their median
🚨 Cybercab’s RGB Light Bar Could Make Finding Your Ride Way Easier Multiple Cybercabs were spotted doing pickups and drop-offs around downtown Austin, and there’s a cool little detail: RGB light bars showing different colors. The idea is pretty smart. Instead of checking license plates or guessing which Cybercab is yours, you could just look for your assigned color! $TSLA via @AdanGuajardo https://t.co/95i0Blw9S5
- Aug 19, 20266.0x their median
Complete and movie 😍
- Aug 21, 20265.0x their median
chudai
- Aug 28, 20264.0x their median
Falcon 9 Booster B1067-38 (yes, 37 flights completed) returning to Port Canaveral. This booster launched the final Falcon 9 mission with Starlink from the East Coast. Starship will take over that role. https://t.co/jJbmBesv27 https://t.co/MlhQJHOJkd
- Aug 28, 20264.0x their median
Tesla needs 137 trucks a day from a Nevada factory that ran quietly for 5 months first. September 24, 2026. Sparks, Nevada. Grand opening. Production started in March. Mass production confirmed April 29. The event comes after the work, not before it. Same playbook Tesla used for Cybertruck in 2023. 1,700,000 square feet. Built next to Gigafactory Nevada, not inside it. First dedicated Semi factory since the truck was unveiled in 2017. 9 years in the making. Design capacity: 50,000 trucks a year. That's 4,167 a month. 137 a day, every day, for 365 days straight. Tesla hasn't said how many it's actually building. Q2 filings lump Semi in with Model S, X, and Cybertruck under one number: 8,822. Nobody outside Tesla knows the real ramp rate. Two configs on sale. 325 miles for $260,000. 500 miles for $290,000. 3 motors. 1,000+ horsepower. 70% charge in 30 minutes on the Mega Charger. Guests get a factory tour and a test drive on the 24th. What they see on the line matters more than the ribbon. A factory built for 137 trucks a day looks nothing like one still making 12. The ribbon gets cut. The real number doesn't come out for months. https://t.co/thev0trKL0
- Aug 28, 20264.0x their median
Elon Musk reveals why all life on Earth ending is a certainty Elon: "If we do not become multi-planetary and ultimately go beyond our solar system, annihilation of all life on Earth is a certainty. A certainty." Start with how briefly we've been here at all. Elon: "Earth is about four and a half billion years old. Civilization as measured from the first writing is only about 5,000 years old." "That's one millionth of Earth's existence. Civilization has been around, it's really a flash in the pan so far." And the clock is not metaphorical. Elon: "The sun is expanding slowly, but it will heat the Earth up at some point in the future, boil the oceans, and Earth will become like Venus, where life as we know it is impossible." Then the number that makes it feel close. Elon: "It could be as little as, on the galactic timescale, half a billion years. It's a long time by human standards, but that's only 10% longer than Earth has been around at all. So if life had taken 10% longer to evolve on Earth, it wouldn't exist at all." He thinks that's what the silence out there means. Elon: "There are these great filters, which civilizations don't pass through. And one of those great filters is, do you become a multi-planetary civilization or not?" "If you don't, it's simply a matter of time before something happens on your planet, either natural or manmade, that causes us to die out. Like the dinosaurs. Where are they now? They didn't have spaceships." https://t.co/9eWV368j5V
- Aug 28, 20264.0x their median
Elon hearing the criticism: He just laughs. Not the polite kind. The kind that says “I’ve heard worse from people who still use Internet Explorer.” After years of being called every name available, the reaction has simplified to pure amusement. The work continues either way. https://t.co/cscgl6kqx6
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 874K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 1% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.1K times each, and 0.019% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.586% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video and 60% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22 interactions, about 22x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #elon, #elonmusk.
- What is PacoJonesFL1's engagement rate on X?
- PacoJonesFL1 (@1PacoFL) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 874,098 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At under 0.001%, PacoJonesFL1 sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @1PacoFL have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 1% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @1PacoFL post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.67 posts per day across the measured window.