Back to @1PacoFL's profile

PacoJonesFL1 engagement report

@1PacoFL - 873K followers on X

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 873K followers
Per impression
0.009%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
1.28%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 873K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.009% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 79% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22 interactions, about 22x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #elon, #elonmusk.

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tags: #elon, #elonmusk.

Compared with accounts its own size

PacoJonesFL1's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, PacoJonesFL1 sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link79% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 79% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 561 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 29, 202622x their median

    Can't wait to ride in one next week. https://t.co/5CpijSIx8p

    1921020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202617x their median

    Elon Musk: "When we went to the moon, we were supposed to have a base on the moon, we were supposed to send people to Mars. And that stuff just didn't happen. It went backwards. And we got the space shuttle, but the space shuttle could only go to low earth orbit, where a Saturn V could go to the moon. Now the space shuttle's gone. And so that just seemed like a really bad thing." https://t.co/Kf6EAV3Y2P

    1304065K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20269.0x their median

    Here's how Elon Musk found out Bill Gates has no basic physics. Gates showed up at Tesla Austin certain a long-range Semi could never work. Energy density? Efficiency? He didn't have a single number. Elon Musk: "You’d think that someone like Bill Gates, who clearly started a technology company that’s one of the biggest companies in the world Microsoft you’d think he’d be really quite strong in the sciences. But actually, at least from my direct conversations with him, he is not strong in the sciences. This was really surprising. He came to visit me at the Tesla Gigafactory in Austin and was telling me that it’s impossible to have a long-range semi-truck. And I was like, “Well, but we literally have them. And you can drive them. And Pepsi is literally using them right now. And you can drive them yourself or send someone. Obviously, Bill Gates is not going to drive it himself, but you can send a trusted person to drive the truck and verify that it can do the things that we say it’s doing.” And he’s like, “No, no, it doesn’t work. It doesn’t work.” And I’m like, “Okay.” I’m kind of stuck there. Then I was like, “Well, so it must be that you disagree with the watt-hours per kilogram of the battery pack. You must think that perhaps we can’t achieve the energy density of the battery pack, or that the watt-hours per mile of the truck is too high, and that when you combine those two numbers, the range is low. “And so, which one of those numbers do you think we have wrong, and what numbers do you think are correct?” And he didn’t know any of the numbers. And I’m like, “Well then, doesn’t it seem that it’s perhaps premature to conclude that a long-range semi cannot work if you do not know the energy density of the battery pack or the energy efficiency of the truck chassis?” https://t.co/GhtPVSpZWC

    710150K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20269.0x their median

    This is hot!!!

    72002.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20268.0x their median

    Kimbal Musk on his brother, Elon Musk: “I think Elon's actually quite reasonable. I think that when you're under so much pressure and really, there's an enormous amount of pressure, it's not that I'm the voice of reason, it's more like I'm helping Elon find his voice of reason, 'Let's slow down a little bit here. What do you think is the right thing to do?' And oftentimes, in 99% of the time, Elon does know what the right thing to do. It's just when you're under so much pressure you can do some silly things... But I think he's actually quite a reasonable person, it's just when you're under so much pressure, it's very hard for anyone to just calm the nervous system and just think about what's right thing to do here.” https://t.co/4WcO7sPTqD

    800046K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20268.0x their median

    Elon says he’s not a dancing puppet: “I’m not your dancing puppet!” Then the music starts and he immediately becomes one. The gap between the image people try to force on him and the version that actually shows up is the whole point. https://t.co/mpFhLEIc1x

    800017K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20266.0x their median

    Raptor 3 drives Starship’s leap in rocket technology. It’s a massive step forward with no base heat shield needed, higher payload and efficiency, safer fuel handling, and a simpler, integrated design. These improvements bring us closer to a practical multiplanetary future. https://t.co/iX0go9yYQE

    600037K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20266.0x their median

    🚨 Cybercab’s RGB Light Bar Could Make Finding Your Ride Way Easier Multiple Cybercabs were spotted doing pickups and drop-offs around downtown Austin, and there’s a cool little detail: RGB light bars showing different colors. The idea is pretty smart. Instead of checking license plates or guessing which Cybercab is yours, you could just look for your assigned color! $TSLA via @AdanGuajardo https://t.co/95i0Blw9S5

    420025K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20266.0x their median

    Call me crazy, but Elon Musk doesn’t exactly look like the “far-right Nazi” or “threat to society” some people portray him as. I think one thing is obvious: If Elon had never endorsed Trump, the way he is viewed by much of the political left would probably be very different. The technology, innovation and companies would still be the same. Only the politics changed. https://t.co/FzcEGP0kZz

    501018K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.0x their median

    Complete and movie 😍

    33001.5K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#elon#elonmusk

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 873K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.009% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 79% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22 interactions, about 22x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #elon, #elonmusk.

What is PacoJonesFL1's engagement rate on X?
PacoJonesFL1 (@1PacoFL) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 62 original posts from the last 30 days against 873,181 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, PacoJonesFL1 sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @1PacoFL have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @1PacoFL post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going