Back to @1Nicdar's profile

DKelly 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 engagement report

@1Nicdar - 471K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.087%
of 471K followers
Per impression
5.25%
7.8K views on a typical post
Reach
1.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
409
interactions (median)
Saved
0.077%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 409 interactions against 471K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 5.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 92K interactions, about 225x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

DKelly 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 90% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.087%, DKelly 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 147 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 2026225x their median

    Canada has redesigned the American flag. Enjoy! https://t.co/8pNiDUuv9t

    75K13K3.0K8393.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026212x their median

    She's not wrong. ⬇️ https://t.co/MusWNtBO9c

    72K14K336267623K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026177x their median

    Democrats: “You can’t just rename Lake Ontario to Lake America. That’s not how reality works!” Also Democrats: “Anyway, this is Jessica. She used to be Steve.”

    62K7.8K1.6K4651.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026164x their median

    True love is a beautiful thing. https://t.co/N3caTgq9w0

    58K3.1K4.8K8673.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202690x their median

    Sitting down? In 20 years the Democrats laundered $12.8 billion through ActBlue. All to destroy America.

    29K7.0K572138181K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202683x their median

    Every ship entering the Great Lakes goes through the Welland Canal, located fully in Canada. There’s no other option. $26.3 billion of US trade depends on it. Would be a shame if tolls skyrocketed or it was transit-taxed heavily… Thank you for your attention to this matter. https://t.co/CmAfXiToOR

    28K5.0K151.2K1.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202673x their median

    It will always be the Gulf of Mexico, Lake Ontario, and Twitter

    26K2.8K1.3K134248K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202661x their median

    One of these two is still employed by @FoxNews. One was fired. Seems backwards to me. https://t.co/mX5ChKjXx8

    21K3.1K975156283K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202659x their median

    Nature always finds a way… to show that liberals are retards. https://t.co/Cujp4wVAyw

    22K2.4K7428172K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 202649x their median

    Ohio, let's do what we can to elect @AmyActonOH as your next Governor and @SherrodBrown as your next U.S. Senator! They’ve dedicated their lives to fighting on behalf of all Ohioans. If we’re willing to organize and mobilize, if we’re willing to turn out in big numbers in Ohio and across this country, if we’re willing to vote for change and vote for Democrats up and down the ballot, then this election might just mark the moment this country began moving in a better direction. So make a plan to vote today at https://t.co/SwSq7BL3ES.

    16K2.6K1.2K98470K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 409 interactions against 471K followers, an engagement rate of 0.087%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.8K times each, and 5.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.65% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 92K interactions, about 225x its own typical post.

What is DKelly 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸's engagement rate on X?
DKelly 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 (@1Nicdar) has an engagement rate of 0.087%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 471,115 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.087%, DKelly 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @1Nicdar have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @1Nicdar post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going