Back to @0xReflection's profile

ReflectionπŸͺ© engagement report

@0xReflection - 226K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.277%
of 226K followers
Per impression
0.847%
74K views on a typical post
Reach
32.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
627
interactions (median)
Saved
0.056%
42 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.07/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 627 interactions against 226K followers, an engagement rate of 0.277%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 74K times each, and 0.847% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ReflectionπŸͺ©'s engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.277%, ReflectionπŸͺ© sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,632 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.128% to 0.604%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,632 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 25,982 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video93% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 275 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 15, 202514x their median

    Are you scared? $BTC https://t.co/vMzHo6D4fJ

    7.1K6398711936.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.8x their median

    $1K into $1M in just 12 hours https://t.co/ylA2ih12Zl

    3.9K11823462321K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20266.6x their median

    Put everything aside and study this. https://t.co/0o7Sm4WPmL

    3.7K27013347429K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.2x their median

    Buy this type of chart Sell in October Thank me later https://t.co/zAJj1vAXJ5

    1.2K3919415564K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20261.9x their median

    Honest question: Do you think $SOL will ever reach this price again? https://t.co/210yE31tn1

    8775522113143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20261.7x their median

    This is exactly what a true bottom looks like https://t.co/FeorVf30r5

    98431725380K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.5x their median

    πŸ“‚ The Complete Crypto Income Map ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Active Trading ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Spot trading ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Swing trading ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Scalping ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Perp futures ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Options ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Funding rate farming ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Basis trades ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Triangular arbitrage ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ CEX/DEX arbitrage ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Copy trading ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Algo/bot trading ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Long-Term Capital ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Core portfolio holding ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Seed/private rounds ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Public sales (ICO/IDO/IEO) ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Governance token accumulation ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Index/basket strategies ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Angel investing in crypto startups ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Yield & DeFi ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Staking (native + liquid) ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Restaking ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Lending/borrowing spreads ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ LP provision ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Yield farming ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Delta-neutral vaults ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Stablecoin yield strategies ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Structured products ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Points & Rewards Meta ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Airdrop farming ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Testnet/mainnet grinding ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Points programs ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Referral loops ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Node/DePIN rewards ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Loyalty/quest platforms ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Attention Economy ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Kaito-style mindshare farming ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Creator campaigns ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Bounty boards ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Research-for-hire ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Data labeling for AI/crypto ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Reputation-based rewards ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Prediction & Forecasting ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Sports/political markets ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Crypto price markets ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Forecasting tournaments ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Market-making on prediction platforms ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Cross-market arbitrage ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Mining & Hardware ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ ASIC mining ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ GPU mining ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Pool vs solo ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Cloud mining ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ DePIN hardware ops ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ NFTs & Digital Collectibles ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Flipping ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Minting ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Fractional/lending markets ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Royalty income ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Collection creation ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ GameFi ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Play-to-earn ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Asset farming/flipping ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Guild scholarships ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Tournament/esports prizes ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Content & Personal Brand ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ X/Twitter ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ YouTube ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Newsletters ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Paid communities ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Sponsored posts ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Affiliate deals ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Ambassador roles ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Premium research/reports ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Freelance & Services ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Smart contract dev ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Audits/security ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Growth/marketing ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Community management ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Design & video editing ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ BD & sales ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Support/moderation ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Building ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ dApps & protocols ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Trading/analytics tools ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Bots ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Wallets & infra ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ AI Γ— crypto tooling ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Crypto SaaS ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ DAOs ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Contributor roles ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Governance participation ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Bounty completion ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Ambassador/mod programs ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Referrals & Affiliates ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Exchange referrals ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Platform affiliate programs ┃ ┣ πŸ“‚ Wallet/app referrals ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Creator referral deals ┃ β”— πŸ“‚ Infrastructure Ops ┣ πŸ“‚ Validators ┣ πŸ“‚ RPC/archival nodes ┣ πŸ“‚ Indexers & oracles ┣ πŸ“‚ Storage/bandwidth/compute providers β”— πŸ“‚ Sequencers & relayers

    791126191173K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    Hey @Grok predict the price of BTC by the end of the year using this chart https://t.co/niNrnRSDZ9

    58315320507K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 2026

    You have survived: FTX collapse Luna/UST wiped out 3AC liquidated Mt. Gox unlocks Germany’s selling WW3 threats Trumps Tariffs Bybit $1.5B hack Oct 11 "Black Saturday" US-Iran war Strategy sells BTC And altseason finally starts https://t.co/yUklML7vOs

    5366521241K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2026

    What’s your favorite moment in crypto? Here's mine: https://t.co/hYi4SWzLcY

    407114075K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 627 interactions against 226K followers, an engagement rate of 0.277%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 74K times each, and 0.847% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 14x its own typical post.

What is ReflectionπŸͺ©'s engagement rate on X?
ReflectionπŸͺ© (@0xReflection) has an engagement rate of 0.277%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 226,111 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.277%, ReflectionπŸͺ© sits above the 50th percentile of the 157,632 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @0xReflection have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @0xReflection post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going