Back to @0xPolygon's profile

Polygon engagement report

@0xPolygon - 2.0M followers on X

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.016%
of 2.0M followers
Per impression
0.881%
38K views on a typical post
Reach
1.86%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
336
interactions (median)
Saved
0.013%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.83/day
active 90% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 336 interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 0.881% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Polygon's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, Polygon sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video84% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link26% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 84% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 26% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 174 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 202636x their median

    Arc Mainnet is live. Arc launches as the Economic OS for the internet: an open platform for global markets, real-time value movement, tokenized assets, and agentic economic activity. Arc is more than a blockchain. It launches as a full-stack financial platform with assets, applications, interoperability, developer infrastructure, and Circle platform services live from day one. Arc delivers USDC as native gas, deterministic sub-second finality, EVM compatibility, and institutional validators. It integrates with Arc Studio, App Kits, Arc Portal, Circle Agent Stack, CCTP, Gateway, CPN, and StableFX. A complete economic platform at genesis. Arc launches with infrastructure for: → Agentic economic workflows → Lending and borrowing → Trading and liquidity → Onchain FX → Payments and settlement → Tokenized assets → Exchanges, wallets, custody, compliance, data, and developer tooling 190+ institutional and ecosystem builders are building across Arc.

    7.8K1.5K1.6K1.1K3.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202612x their median

    We’re rolling out EURR, our first euro-backed stablecoin, in the Revolut app. https://t.co/UVcns1mytF

    3.0K3132902761.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20266.0x their median

    like this if you remember MATIC

    1.8K48136768K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20265.0x their median

    Your agent finally gets its own wallet. MetaMask Agent Wallet is now live for everyone. https://t.co/F81PZ7etxv

    1.3K163153901.7M viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20263.8x their median

    BREAKING: Polygon Labs is now a U.S.-regulated payments business. The Coinme acquisition is complete. It brings regulated U.S. money movement into Polygon Open Money Stack. @Tazapay, @meshpay, @useToku, and Kira join as the first set of businesses moving money with the unified stack.

    9151801296985K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20263.6x their median

    BREAKING: @trondao is now live on Polygon OMS. Move, program and store stablecoins anywhere on Earth. The full money flow, now on TRON. https://t.co/0D2Vh5PHQ3

    86415811165138K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.5x their median

    BIG UPDATE: 100M POL ready to be permanently BURNED. Polygon is printing revenue. $24.5m YTD. We are deploying a change that lets anyone in the community trigger its burn. 2026YTD Revenue Super happy about $NEAR and $ARB getting much deserved love, but in terms of revenue, my analyst at ChatGPT says: ethereum:0x455e53cbb86018ac2b8092fdcd39d8444affc3f6 : 24.5mn $ARB : $8.41m (Includes the trailblazing Robinhood chain) $NEAR : $5.6m (Includes the now legendary Near Intents) ethereum:0x455e53cbb86018ac2b8092fdcd39d8444affc3f6 is 3x revenue of $ARB, 5x of $NEAR. I hope the market gods will shower their smiles on ethereum:0x455e53cbb86018ac2b8092fdcd39d8444affc3f6 community too someday. BTW huge kudos and love to both @NEARProtocol and @arbitrum teams and communities (Forgive me for this bad cope on ethereum:0x455e53cbb86018ac2b8092fdcd39d8444affc3f6 missing out of the rally till now 😥😥) Anyways, the contracts are on testnet, after the final Security Council signatures, they go to mainnet. Then anyone can trigger the first burn, permanently burning the 100M POL instantly. Post that every quarter, anyone from the community would be able to burn ethereum:0x455e53cbb86018ac2b8092fdcd39d8444affc3f6 from the supply Since January 2026, POL has been deflationary and the network is still getting hammered with activity…payments, trades, consumer apps, everything. We have scaled 10x to 5k TPS and multiple earth shattering updates are coming on the TPS front. Every base fee adds POL to the collector. it has reached 121M POL. It's your time to burn 100M! 🔥

    84314015950154K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20263.3x their median

    NEW: Europe's largest banking network, Sparkasse, has enabled crypto trading on Polygon for 50 million retail customers with $POL. https://t.co/ywYISDolMO

    878141601552K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.1x their median

    BURN COMPLETE: 100 MILLION POL (~1% of POL total supply) IS OFFICIALLY BURNED PERMANENTLY. https://t.co/3MOAw9eD8o https://t.co/incm4389Df

    7791061372998K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20262.7x their median

    is it safe to tweet now

    683241851066K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 336 interactions against 2.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 38K times each, and 0.881% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 84% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is Polygon's engagement rate on X?
Polygon (@0xPolygon) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 62 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,047,082 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, Polygon sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @0xPolygon have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @0xPolygon post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going