Nonzee engagement report
@0xNonceSense - 110K followers on X
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 110K followers, an engagement rate of 0.078%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 913 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Nonzee's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.078%, Nonzee sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 78% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 22% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 1204 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 20, 202611x their median
ETHEREUM IS SETTING THE FINAL TRAP BEFORE $7,000. $ETH hit $1,920 exactly as planned. The next magnet is $2,000. That move will look bullish. It is not. That is where the trap starts. My Ethereum roadmap is still clear: 1. $1,800 gets tested first. 2. $2,000 gets tagged next. 3. $2,200 comes if BTC hits $70K. 4. 7 to 10 days of distribution. 5. Final bottom zone: $1,300 to $900. 6. Then the new bull cycle begins. Target remains $7,000. Most people will buy the wrong part of this move. They will call $2,000 strength. They will call $2,200 confirmation. I call it exit liquidity. The real buy zone is not here. It is $1,300 to $900. That is where I want ETH. That is where the crowd will be too scared to touch it. A wick into the 2022 low zone is still possible. That will not kill the trend. It will complete the reset. Ethereum hate was part of the setup. It forced retail out before the real opportunity. The same voices will flip bullish later. But only after ETH is already far above them. I warned about the $82K bull trap before it broke. I warned about the summer drop before it started. The next call is the biggest one of this cycle. Turn notifications on before ETH enters the final zone. Most people will follow too late.
- Aug 19, 20266.6x their median
🚨 GOLD JUST GAVE BUYERS ANOTHER TRAP. Trap 1: ~$5,400. Everyone called it a breakout. Trap 2: ~$4,800. Everyone called it the bottom. Trap 3: ~$4,500. Everyone is calling it the dip again. Three rallies. Three lower highs. No real higher low. That is not strength. It is distribution. First zone: $4,000 to $3,800. 29% to 32% below the peak. Second zone: $3,400 to $3,200. 39% to 43% below the peak. I start buying in the second zone. Not before. Gold is already down ~20% from the ~$5,600 peak, yet buyers keep stepping in earlier on every decline. Everyone buying $4,500 today may simply become the exit liquidity for those who bought $4,800. Bookmark this and check it in October. Follow and turn notifications on. I’ll post the exact level where I buy.
- Aug 22, 20265.7x their median
🚨 SILVER JUST GAVE BUYERS ANOTHER TRAP. Trap 1: $118 in February. Everyone called it a breakout. Trap 2: $89 in May. Everyone called it the bottom. Trap 3: $70 this week. Everyone is calling it the dip. Three rallies. Three lower highs. No real higher low. That is not strength. That is distribution. Each trap has been sold from roughly 22% below the one before it. First zone: $55 to $50. That is 54% to 58% below the peak. Second zone: $45 to $40. That is 63% to 67% below the peak. I start buying in the second zone. Not before. Silver is already down 43% from $120, and buyers step in earlier on every single decline. That is the tell. Impatience gets cheaper every time, right up until it does not. Everyone buying $69 today is the exit for everyone who bought $89 in May. Bookmark this and check it in October. Follow and turn notifications on. I post the exact level where I buy.
- May 29, 20265.0x their median
AI BUBBLE IS BIGGER THAN DOTCOM. Shiller CAPE: 42.32. Last seen in 1999. Buffett Indicator: 229.9% vs 146% in 2000. 1.6x worse. Top 10 stocks: 41% of S&P vs 23% in 2000. Margin debt: $1.28T = 4.1% GDP vs 2.7% in 2000. Margin debt peaked Jan 2026 and dropped 4.5% in two months. S&P dropped 5.9% in the same window. Last time margin debt rolled over before the market? 2000. 2007. In 2000, Lucent helped finance customers who bought Lucent equipment. In 2026, Nvidia invests in companies that buy Nvidia chips. Same loop. Different label. Buffett is sitting on $325B in cash and selling stocks. He is reading the same math. One bad earnings report on AI spending and the repricing starts. With 41% of the index in the same trade, there is nowhere clean to hide. When the next move becomes clear, I'll post it here first. Follow and turn notifications on.
- Aug 21, 20264.5x their median
🚨 BTC IS SETTING UP FOR PULLBACK Seeing Bitcoin green today? It is not a reversal. It is a schedule. Here is how the CLARITY Act gets traded, start to finish. Phase 1: Fake relief. Happening now. A bounce off support to squeeze shorts. $3.1 billion liquidated already. Phase 2: The trap. Late August. An engineered dump back toward $55,000 to catch every leveraged long that chased this bounce. Phase 3: The shakeout. Mid September. The Senate returns, the media declares the bill dead for this year, and the last holders capitulate into $45,000. Phase 4: Silent accumulation. October to December. Insiders absorb spot volume while nobody is watching, because nobody watches a market everyone has written off. Phase 5: The vote. Year end. The bill passes. The green light arrives. The coins are already gone. Understand the logic and the whole thing becomes obvious. Nobody who knows a bullish catalyst is coming wants to buy before it. They want you to sell before it. The bill is not the trade. The panic before the bill is the trade. I'm flat until $50,000, and I post the moment I start buying. Bookmark this and check it in October. Follow and turn notifications on.
- Jul 29, 20263.8x their median
🚨 KOREA IS CRASHING 7 TIMES FASTER THAN 2008 KOSPI is down 43% in 40 days. 2008 took 371 days to fall 57%. COVID took 784 days to fall 44%. This one did 43% in 40. 9 circuit breakers have fired this year. The exchange has seen 15 in its entire 26-year history. Sixty percent of them happened in one year. Here is what broke it: leverage. Retail piled into margin loans and single-stock leveraged ETFs to chase the rally. The SK Hynix leveraged ETF fell 32% in a single day. Forced liquidations have wiped out 2.3 trillion won in ten weeks. Individuals dumped another 2 trillion won today alone. KOSPI has fallen from the world's 6th largest market to 11th in one month. The government is now standing up national debt counselling in response. That is what the end of a leverage cycle actually looks like. Every market that runs this playbook ends the same way. It is already loaded in the US market. I will post the moment it starts. Follow and turn notifications on.
- Aug 10, 20263.5x their median
ETHEREUM IS SETTING THE FINAL TRAP BEFORE $4,500. Thousands of traders drew the same $ETH chart. They are all waiting for a final flush to $1,475 before they buy. That flush is not coming. The real shakeout already happened in June and July. Two sweeps below the range. Both recovered within days. Nobody called it, because it was too quiet to feel like a bottom. $ETH is $1,872 today. What actually comes next: October: a pullback to $1,537 That is the retest, and it is a higher low, not a new low $2,203: reclaimed on the way up $2,872: the range high, break it and the trend is confirmed 2027: $4,500 Full measured target: $4,500 to $4,700 So yes, buy the October dip. Just understand it will be 15% higher than the price everyone in your replies is holding out for. They will still be in cash at $2,800, waiting for $1,475. The crowd never buys the bottom. It waits for a cheaper one that never comes. I called the $126,190 Bitcoin top and the $15,768 bottom by reading price, not diagrams. When I start buying, I post it here publicly, like I always do. Follow and turn notifications on.
- Sep 12, 20263.2x their median
🚨 THIS IS EXACTLY HOW 2008 STARTED. EVERYONE IS IGNORING IT US 30-year yield: 5.356%. Back in the zone seen before the 2008 financial crisis. Now the Fed is considering two more hikes on top of that. Government debt needs refinancing. The AI buildout needs its next round of funding. Every extra 0.50 percentage point costs $5 billion annually on $1 trillion of new borrowing. Interest gets paid first. Data centers get built second. The chain from here is simple: More expensive funding → delayed AI projects → fewer chip orders → earnings cuts → S&P 500 pressure The weakest borrowers break first. Their suppliers break next. That is the credit risk nobody is pricing into the AI trade. 2008 showed how fast a boom collapses when financing stops working. Most traders still believe the Fed will pause before any real damage hits. They are wrong. Renewed tightening forces a reversal before inflation reaches 2%. Investment and jobs crack before the target gets hit. The red arrow is the move I'm watching as growth weakens and long yields roll over. By the time rate cuts arrive, the damage is already done. First the credit squeeze. Then the policy reversal. Then the earnings misses. Follow and turn notifications on.
- Aug 26, 20263.2x their median
🚨 ETHEREUM’S $2,500 BREAKOUT IS THE TRAP $ETH just reached $2,500, and suddenly everyone thinks the real rally has started. It has not. The accumulation structure is still missing one final move. Ethereum must retest $1,500 before the run to $4,500 begins. That drop will look like the entire structure has failed. It will actually be the final shakeout that completes it. The path is simple: $2,500 → $1,500 → $1,750 → $2,400 → $2,600 → $3,200 → $4,500 At $2,500, the crowd is chasing the breakout. At $1,500, the same crowd will panic and call Ethereum dead. Above $2,600, they will buy back after the safe entry is already gone. Same traders. Same coins. Worse price. I am not chasing Ethereum here. I am waiting for the final $1,500 retest. When I start buying Ethereum, I will post it here publicly. Follow and turn notifications on before the final shakeout begins.
- Jul 15, 20263.1x their median
Bitcoin is stuck at $65K–$63K for a reason. The bulltrap is almost over. Next week, BTC dumps to $55K. After that, the 2026 pattern is simple: $65K → $55K → $45K → $55K → $130K Next targets: → $55K in days → $45K by August Reminder: I called the $16K Bitcoin bottom and the $126K top. The next call is coming. My followers will see it first. Follow and turn notifications on. Most people will follow me too late.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 86 interactions against 110K followers, an engagement rate of 0.078%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.62% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 913 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
- What is Nonzee's engagement rate on X?
- Nonzee (@0xNonceSense) has an engagement rate of 0.078%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 110,111 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.078%, Nonzee sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @0xNonceSense have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @0xNonceSense post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.