wyck 📴 engagement report
@wyckoffweb - 224K followers on X
Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 154 interactions against 224K followers, an engagement rate of 0.069%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 14,930 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.
Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
wyck 📴's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (14,930 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.069%, wyck 📴 sits above the 25th percentile of the 151,672 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.021% to 0.126%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.021% |
| 50th percentile | 0.126% |
| 75th percentile | 0.6% |
| 90th percentile | 2.29% |
| 99th percentile | 84.2% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 53% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 5% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 53% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 461 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 27, 202612x their median
FYI, we haven’t launched our mainnet yet No possibility of RPC leakage as well since we’ve never launched it 🤷♂️ “DYOR” and stay safe from FUDs and scams
- Sep 9, 202611x their median
Just bought 100 @MortalsHQ including the 1/1 Golden grail to show continued support of this collection and the entire NFT space. 4 female artists originally hand drew these 1300 as a Independant art project. Happy to join this community of holders today !!!! https://t.co/ozMM7j7Nv0
- May 2, 20269.1x their median
X is cool. But it’s 1000x better when your timeline is filled with people who trade, build, invest and make money. If you’re into perps, memecoins, prediction markets, AI, vibe coding, testnets, NFTs, content creation, and Web3 jobs. say hi 👋
- Sep 25, 20264.3x their median
33.33% $JUMP allocated for the community airdrop by Jumper This is a sure cook my people. https://t.co/5dL1gjsvtJ
- Sep 28, 20264.0x their median
I just claimed $486 from a txn I made back in 2024, and you could have something to claim too. Apparently, there’s over $135M stuck across bridges from more than 522,000 wallets. If you’ve ever bridged funds using Wormhole, LayerZero or any other bridge, it might be worth checking. - Go to https://t.co/sBFDxPOEEc - Paste your wallet address. You don’t need to connect your wallet. - It’ll show you if you have any stuck funds to claim. - If you do, you’ll see a guide showing you how to claim them. Good luck.
- Sep 25, 20263.7x their median
For week 41 of the Omni points program, 150,000 points were distributed across 30,358 accounts. https://t.co/hpg64F0h1J
- Sep 2, 20263.6x their median
kinda wondering what robinhood did right that both monad and megaeth did wrong?
- Sep 27, 20263.1x their median
I know a guy. He lost about $5,000 on Arc mainnet because he was late to the party. So, he swore to himself that he would be early to GIWA Chain and not make the same mistake he made with Arc. Well, he just lost another $5,000 trying to be early to GIWA mainnet.
- Sep 11, 20263.1x their median
Arbitrum gave one project 75,000 ARB for liquidity incentives. The team swapped the entire grant to USDC, bridged it to Base, then apparently stopped operating. Arbitrum gave them until yesterday to explain themselves or return the money. They didn’t reply. They didn’t return the money either. Now the DAO is voting to permanently ban them. Getting a grant from one ecosystem just to bridge the money to another chain and disappear is crazy.
- Sep 27, 20263.0x their median
Scammers found a way to make people send them $2M on their own without sending them a phishing link. They created an entire fake GIWA Mainnet. Then used the real GIWA Chain ID: 9134 for the fake network. So when people added the network to their wallets, everything looked legitimate. Then they created a fake bridge. People connected their own wallets. Sent their own ETH. And approved the transactions themselves. Except the ETH wasn't actually being bridged to GIWA. It was being sent straight to addresses controlled by the scammers. By the time people realized the entire "GIWA Mainnet" they were using was fake, roughly $2M had already been lost. They literally created a fake blockchain using the real Chain ID and got people to bridge their money into it themselves. You've got to be extremely careful this days.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 154 interactions against 224K followers, an engagement rate of 0.069%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 14,930 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.12% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 53% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.8K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.
- What is wyck 📴's engagement rate on X?
- wyck 📴 (@wyckoffweb) has an engagement rate of 0.069%, based on the median interactions across 62 original posts from the last 30 days against 223,850 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.069%, wyck 📴 sits above the 25th percentile of the 151,672 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @wyckoffweb have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (14,930 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @wyckoffweb post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.